On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 02:10:50PM +0200, Sten Daniel Sørsdal wrote:
> > >
> > I have a bridge with one fxp0 nic (which I renamed to net0) and one tap1
> > device. The other end runs linux as DHCP server on LAN.
> > It communicates with the DHCP server through the fxp0 device which is a
> > member
> >
> I have a bridge with one fxp0 nic (which I renamed to net0) and one tap1
> device. The other end runs linux as DHCP server on LAN.
> It communicates with the DHCP server through the fxp0 device which is a
> member of the same bridge.
>
Then it would in my opinion be more correct to run dhc
On Thu, 22 Sep 2005 11:35:06 +0100 (BST)
Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2005, Marcin Jessa wrote:
>
> > I do not know if it's meant to be that way but tap devices cannot
> > get IPs assigned with DHCP. I did not check the old dhclient code
> > but the new one cannot
On Thu, 22 Sep 2005, Marcin Jessa wrote:
I do not know if it's meant to be that way but tap devices cannot get
IPs assigned with DHCP. I did not check the old dhclient code but the
new one cannot hand over DHCP requests to tap devices. I was sure a tap
device acted as an ethernet device even
