Mike Silbersack wrote:
>
> On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
>
> > Comments?
> >
> > BMS
>
> I think that anything to clean up the routing table is a good idea...
> however, aren't there a few major non-committed patches to this area which
> are almost ready? (Sam's locking, someone el
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 11:00:10AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> I think these uncommitted patches will mostly affect route.c, while this
> patch is for rtsock.c, the route(4) interface with the kernel, which is
> unlikely to change a lot.
Much-improved patch to cleanup rtsock.c at bde's prodding
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 02:40:22AM -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote:
>
> On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
>
> > Comments?
> >
> > BMS
>
> I think that anything to clean up the routing table is a good idea...
> however, aren't there a few major non-committed patches to this area which
> are
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> Comments?
>
> BMS
I think that anything to clean up the routing table is a good idea...
however, aren't there a few major non-committed patches to this area which
are almost ready? (Sam's locking, someone else's moving cloned routes
into a tcpstatcac
