Xin LI wrote:
Hi,
A friend of mine has encountered some problem in his setup which
consists a pair of GRE peer, one running on OpenBSD and another
running FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE; with 7.2-STABLE, there is no improvement
over the situation. The problem we have observed seems to be related
to GRE pa
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 12:38:07AM -0800, Xin LI wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A friend of mine has encountered some problem in his setup which
> consists a pair of GRE peer, one running on OpenBSD and another
> running FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE; with 7.2-STABLE, there is no improvement
> over the situation. The pr
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> ifconfig xl1 xxx.xxx.xxx.63/27
> sysctl net.link.ether.inet.proxyall=1
>
> And use xxx.xxx.xxx.32/27 in internal net for the customers
> with default gateway xxx.xxx.xxx.63.
>
> Swap masks if you want more then /27 for customers:
>
> nic 1: xl0
ifconfig xl1 xxx.xxx.xxx.63/27
sysctl net.link.ether.inet.proxyall=1
And use xxx.xxx.xxx.32/27 in internal net for the customers
with default gateway xxx.xxx.xxx.63.
Swap masks if you want more then /27 for customers:
nic 1: xl0, xxx.xxx.xxx.2/30
nic 2: xl1, xxx.xxx.xxx.63/27
and net.link.ethe
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> Hi everyone. I'm trying to do some strange things to the routing table, and
> I can't get them to work.
> Our ISP assigned us a /26 subnet. xxx.xxx.xx.1 is the main router, a Cisco
> 2511. xx.xx.xx.2 is the main server, and there are a few machi
Koroush Saraf wrote:
> Since I have a single nic card I invoke the following:
> routed -s
> I also have used the flags -P pm_rdisc and -P rdisc_interval=45, but I think
> that's irrelevant at this moment.
As someone else noted, you'll need ripv2.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Koroush Saraf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Koroush Saraf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 9:38 AM
Subject: Re: Routing question, Routed using one interface (more info)
>
Koroush Saraf wrote:
> I have several bsd4.3 computers each with one NIC on a shared LAN as below:
Well, on a shared link layer network...
> Now I like to turn on Routed, and have the approperiate routes discovered.
what options are you invoking routed with? do you have firewall enabled?
T
As I have said before. RIP (routed) won't announce a 10.x.x.x network
address, regardless of your VLSM netmask, as anything but 255.0.0.0,
i.e. 10/8.
You may be able to work around this using RIPv2. I haven't played with
FreeBSD's implementation of it. Otherwise, using RIPv1, try using
several di
I'm making a new post to attach the network diagram in order to clarify my
question.
I have several bsd4.3 computers each with one NIC on a shared LAN as below:
+-+
|10.1.1.1/24 |
| +--+
| | |
+-+ |
|
+-+ |
|10.1.1.
> Also I have addressed my computers in the 10.x.x.x range which is the
> private IP address range and not internet routable. Does ROUTED care about
> the range of addresses in use or all IP addresses are using in the routing
> table as valid routable addresses. Just wanted to make sure this
11 matches
Mail list logo
