-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 04:08, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
In Message-Id: <20100426080815.ga41...@icarus.home.lan>
Foremost, sorry for the cross-post, but more eyes in this case means
overall more discussion. Secondly, please keep me CC'd as I'm not on
ei
Hi, all--
On Apr 26, 2010, at 1:59 AM, Guido Falsi wrote:
> Regarding launchd, I don't know much about it, but I do like the rc
> system and having the boot sequence managed by scripts one can easily
> modify to taste. I'd rather not modify this system with some daemon
> performing obscure tasks b
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 01:08:15AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>> Foremost, sorry for the cross-post, but more eyes in this case means
>> overall more discussion. Secondly, please keep me CC'd as I'm not on
>> either -rc or -net.
>>
>> I recently proposed addition of a new script to the rc fra
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 01:08:15AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> Foremost, sorry for the cross-post, but more eyes in this case means
> overall more discussion. Secondly, please keep me CC'd as I'm not on
> either -rc or -net.
>
> I recently proposed addition of a new script to the rc framework
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 09:00:07AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 4/26/10 1:08 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> >Foremost, sorry for the cross-post, but more eyes in this case means
> >overall more discussion. Secondly, please keep me CC'd as I'm not on
> >either -rc or -net.
> >
> >I recently pro
On 4/26/10 1:08 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Foremost, sorry for the cross-post, but more eyes in this case means
overall more discussion. Secondly, please keep me CC'd as I'm not on
either -rc or -net.
I recently proposed addition of a new script to the rc framework which
verifies (using ping) t
I did read the original thread, and like the idea. I myself have servers
winth ntpd failing to configure tiself at boot due to this problem and
was thinking of some hack to force the behaviour you suggest.
If you use the OpenNTPd instead of classical ntpd one, you won't suffer
this odd behav
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 01:08:15AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> Foremost, sorry for the cross-post, but more eyes in this case means
> overall more discussion. Secondly, please keep me CC'd as I'm not on
> either -rc or -net.
>
> I recently proposed addition of a new script to the rc framework
