;s Dr Zhang ? nice to meet you !
winson sheng
winson sheng
From: Hongjiang Zhang
Date: 2016-12-23 11:44
To: 盛慧华; freebsd-net
Subject: RE: RE: question about fopen fd limit
Ok. I know.
There are two possible solutions:
...@corp.netease.com]
Sent: Friday, December 23, 2016 11:02 AM
To: Hongjiang Zhang ; freebsd-net
Subject: Re: RE: question about fopen fd limit
hi all,
not map TCP to FILE, you misunderstanding my meaning~
for example, if my server tcp already holds 32000 connection
fopen only has 767 fd to
Zhang ? nice to meet you !
winson sheng
winson sheng
From: Hongjiang Zhang
Date: 2016-12-23 11:44
To: 盛慧华; freebsd-net
Subject: RE: RE: question about fopen fd limit
Ok. I know.
There are two pos
Why do you need to map TCP fd to FILE?
It is difficult to modify FILE structure. If it is possible, let us figure out
some new designs to meet your requirement.
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org] On
Behalf Of ???
Sent: Thursday
ugh for me, and i don't wanna change a lot of
FILE function that take FILE * as its argument ~
Thank you ~~~
winson sheng
winson sheng
From: Hongjiang Zhang
Date: 2016-12-23 10:17
To: 盛慧华; freebsd-net
Subject: RE: question about fopen fd limi
On 12/22/16 10:57, 盛慧华 wrote:
and even in BSD 10 , it seems this short limit still there , but other OS as
debian , FILE strucnt's fileno is a int .
* Certain members of __sFILE are accessed directly via macros or
* inline functions. To preserve ABI compat, these members must not
* be di
