Re: ping: sendto: No buffer space available

2012-10-01 Thread Rudy (bulk)
On 9/28/12 11:02 PM, Hooman Fazaeli wrote: On 9/27/2012 9:38 PM, Rudy wrote: On 09/27/2012 11:00 AM, Rudy wrote: Rebooting and/or the settings change seems to have stopped the errors. Here is a pretty little graph showing error rate on em1 for the past 3 days. http://www.monkeybrains.net/i

Re: ping: sendto: No buffer space available

2012-09-28 Thread Hooman Fazaeli
On 9/27/2012 9:38 PM, Rudy wrote: On 09/27/2012 11:00 AM, Rudy wrote: Rebooting and/or the settings change seems to have stopped the errors. Here is a pretty little graph showing error rate on em1 for the past 3 days. http://www.monkeybrains.net/images/ErrorRate-em1.png Interesting... if

Re: ping: sendto: No buffer space available

2012-09-27 Thread Rudy
On 09/27/2012 11:00 AM, Rudy wrote: Rebooting and/or the settings change seems to have stopped the errors. Here is a pretty little graph showing error rate on em1 for the past 3 days. http://www.monkeybrains.net/images/ErrorRate-em1.png Interesting... if I zoom in on the graph, I see the er

Re: ping: sendto: No buffer space available

2012-09-27 Thread Rudy
On 09/27/2012 11:00 AM, Rudy wrote: On 09/25/2012 01:37 AM, Hooman Fazaeli wrote: dev.em.1.link_irq: 6379725883 dev.em.2.link_irq: 6379294926 Based on the strangely high value of dev.em.1.link_irq (which means too many link status changes: down -> up -> down -> ), I guess the problem

Re: ping: sendto: No buffer space available

2012-09-27 Thread Rudy
On 09/25/2012 01:37 AM, Hooman Fazaeli wrote: dev.em.1.link_irq: 6379725883 dev.em.2.link_irq: 6379294926 Based on the strangely high value of dev.em.1.link_irq (which means too many link status changes: down -> up -> down -> ), I guess the problem is the same as discussed in these th

Re: ping: sendto: No buffer space available

2012-09-25 Thread Hooman Fazaeli
On 9/25/2012 11:08 AM, Rudy (bulk) wrote: On 9/24/12 11:52 PM, Hooman Fazaeli wrote: sysctl dev.em.1 From the side having the 'No buffer space available' (FreeBSD 8.3 Sep 13 2012) # sysctl dev.em.1 dev.em.1.%desc: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection 7.3.2 dev.em.1.%driver: em dev.em.1.%lo

Re: ping: sendto: No buffer space available

2012-09-25 Thread Hooman Fazaeli
On 9/25/2012 11:08 AM, Rudy (bulk) wrote: On 9/24/12 11:52 PM, Hooman Fazaeli wrote: sysctl dev.em.1 From the side having the 'No buffer space available' (FreeBSD 8.3 Sep 13 2012) # sysctl dev.em.1 dev.em.1.%desc: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection 7.3.2 dev.em.1.%driver: em dev.em.1.%lo

Re: ping: sendto: No buffer space available

2012-09-25 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Sep 25, 2012, at 12:38 AM, "Rudy (bulk)" wrote: > On 9/24/12 11:52 PM, Hooman Fazaeli wrote: >> sysctl dev.em.1 > > From the side having the 'No buffer space available' (FreeBSD 8.3 Sep 13 > 2012) > > # sysctl dev.em.1 > dev.em.1.%desc: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection 7.3.2 > dev.em.

Re: ping: sendto: No buffer space available

2012-09-25 Thread Rudy (bulk)
On 9/24/12 11:52 PM, Hooman Fazaeli wrote: sysctl dev.em.1 From the side having the 'No buffer space available' (FreeBSD 8.3 Sep 13 2012) # sysctl dev.em.1 dev.em.1.%desc: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection 7.3.2 dev.em.1.%driver: em dev.em.1.%location: slot=0 function=0 dev.em.1.%pnpinfo

Re: ping: sendto: No buffer space available

2012-09-24 Thread Hooman Fazaeli
On 9/24/2012 7:50 PM, Rudy (bulk) wrote: Sometimes when I try to ping a neighbor machine (plugged directly in with no switch involved), I get: ping: sendto: No buffer space available ping: sendto: No buffer space available If I reset the interface 'ifconfig em1 down; ifconfig em1 up' the pr

Re: ping: sendto: No buffer space available

2012-09-24 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Rudy (bulk) wrote: > On 9/24/12 5:01 PM, Ryan Stone wrote: >> >> Can you get the output of netstat -I emX -d? > > ... > >> >> I suspect that you are seeing the em TX queue fill up. If so you >> should see output drops reported by the em interface. >> > I do see 20

Re: ping: sendto: No buffer space available

2012-09-24 Thread Rudy (bulk)
On 9/24/12 8:49 PM, Erich Dollansky wrote: Hi, On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 20:06:22 -0700 "Rudy (bulk)" wrote: Checking all the interfaces, there are a lot more drops/Ierrs on em2... The igb devices (PCIe card) seem a lot better than the Supermicro motherboard em devices. Is this an on-board vs mb t

Re: ping: sendto: No buffer space available

2012-09-24 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 20:06:22 -0700 "Rudy (bulk)" wrote: > Checking all the interfaces, there are a lot more drops/Ierrs on > em2... The igb devices (PCIe card) seem a lot better than the > Supermicro motherboard em devices. Is this an on-board vs mb thing, > or em vs igb thing? > I do not

Re: ping: sendto: No buffer space available

2012-09-24 Thread Rudy (bulk)
On 9/24/12 5:01 PM, Ryan Stone wrote: Can you get the output of netstat -I emX -d? ... I suspect that you are seeing the em TX queue fill up. If so you should see output drops reported by the em interface. I do see 205 in the 'Drop' column. I ran the command twice two hours apart... I am s

Re: ping: sendto: No buffer space available

2012-09-24 Thread Ryan Stone
Can you get the output of netstat -I emX -d? You don't need to run that when the problem is happening -- you just need to run it on the machine after it exhibits the issue without any reboots in the interim. I suspect that you are seeing the em TX queue fill up. If so you should see output drops

Re: ping: sendto: No buffer space available

2012-09-24 Thread Eugen Konkov
Здравствуйте, Rudy. check routing table and show which IP you ping. Вы писали 24 сентября 2012 г., 19:20:28: Rb> Sometimes when I try to ping a neighbor machine (plugged directly in Rb> with no switch involved), I get: Rb> ping: sendto: No buffer space available Rb> ping: sendto: No buffer sp