On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 11:05:52PM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > The problem with the "just let it be a router" approach is that I
> > want all traffic from B to go to A and C, not just that which is
> > actually intended for said net (yes all can be considered nets).
>
> the thing is, i do not s
Clark Gaylord wrote:
>
> I am interested in creating a pathological lab network with the
> following forwarding rules:
> - three networks (A,B,C)
> - packets from A or C are forwarded to B
> - packets from B are forward to both A and C
>
> I was thinking of using BRIDGE+ipfw to create this by
> Thank you for your response. Btw, I've been reading over the
> bridge code ... many thanks for this valuable resource!
>
> The problem with the "just let it be a router" approach is that I
> want all traffic from B to go to A and C, not just that which is
> actually intended for said net (yes
Hello Luigi --
Thank you for your response. Btw, I've been reading over the
bridge code ... many thanks for this valuable resource!
The problem with the "just let it be a router" approach is that I
want all traffic from B to go to A and C, not just that which is
actually intended for said net (
Hi,
if you want to use bridging and you know the IPs of the hosts on
"networks" A, B, and C (which is what you need to use the 'deny'
rules) you do not need to hack bridge.c
On the other hand, your solution will not block ARPs and subnet-broadcast
packets, so i really think the best solution is
