Re: ng_split.c

2005-10-03 Thread David Vos
On 10/3/05, Gleb Smirnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > R> Gleb, is it on RELENG_5 ? > > Yes. That's what I meant. Either it wasn't marked as such when I checked, or I just didn't see it (quite possible). Thanks. David ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org maili

Re: ng_split.c

2005-10-03 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 11:15:59AM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote: R> >D> The version of ng_split.c packaged with 5.4 Release has a bug in it R> >D> that causes items to get lost (not freed) if there are no nodes R> >D> connected on the other end. R> >D> R> >D> This has been fixed in the CVS, Revision

Re: ng_split.c

2005-10-03 Thread Roman Kurakin
Gleb Smirnoff wrote: On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 02:27:11PM -0600, David Vos wrote: D> The version of ng_split.c packaged with 5.4 Release has a bug in it D> that causes items to get lost (not freed) if there are no nodes D> connected on the other end. D> D> This has been fixed in the CVS, Revision

Re: ng_split.c

2005-10-02 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 02:27:11PM -0600, David Vos wrote: D> The version of ng_split.c packaged with 5.4 Release has a bug in it D> that causes items to get lost (not freed) if there are no nodes D> connected on the other end. D> D> This has been fixed in the CVS, Revision 1.7 D> D> Would it be