* Jeremy Chadwick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > I added it directly to the 2nd CPU (diagram on page 9 of
> > http://www.tyan.com/manuals/m_s2895_101.pdf) and the problem
> > seems to be the interaction between nfe0 and powerd :
>
> That board is the weirdest thing I've seen in years.
K8WE
re,
Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 04:52:55PM +0200, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
> > Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Uh, you're getting server-side data corruption, it could definitely be
> > > because of the memory you added.
> >
> > yop, tho
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 06:24:45PM +0200, Erik Trulsson wrote:
> As for reliability I see no particular reason for that board to be less
> reliable than any other multi-CPU board.
Sorry for my complete and total opinionated noise, then.
--
| Jeremy Chadwickjdc at
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 08:43:33AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 04:52:55PM +0200, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
> > Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Uh, you're getting server-side data corruption, it could definitely be
> > > because of the memory you added.
> >
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 04:52:55PM +0200, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
> Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Uh, you're getting server-side data corruption, it could definitely be
> > because of the memory you added.
>
> yop, though I'm still not convinced the memory is bad (the very same
> K
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 01:02:33AM +0200, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
>
> > I didn't stress-test this MB for a while, but last time I did was
> > with 7-PRELEASE/RC?/CANTremember-exactly-but-close-to-release
> > and all worked great
> >
> > I did add 2G EC
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 01:02:33AM +0200, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
> I didn't stress-test this MB for a while, but last time I did was
> with 7-PRELEASE/RC?/CANTremember-exactly-but-close-to-release
> and all worked great
>
> I did add 2G ECC to the 2nd CPU since, though I doubt that interferes
>
