Re: new CARP implementation

2011-10-26 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
Hello networkers, I've rolled out a new patch & README here: http://people.freebsd.org/~glebius/newcarp/ The most important change since last version is not sending spurious graturious ARP announce on startup. -- Totus tuus, Glebius. ___ freeb

Re: new CARP implementation

2011-10-15 Thread Andre Oppermann
On 14.10.2011 21:12, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 09:06:57PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote: A> > Won't ifconfig it down work? A> A> Not if I want to continue to use the primary or other non-carp address. Well, the best idea for that case would be switch them to backup mode. In

Re: new CARP implementation

2011-10-14 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 09:06:57PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote: A> > Won't ifconfig it down work? A> A> Not if I want to continue to use the primary or other non-carp address. Well, the best idea for that case would be switch them to backup mode. In presense of active master, they won't show up

Re: new CARP implementation

2011-10-14 Thread Andre Oppermann
On 14.10.2011 20:48, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 08:14:34PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote: A> On 14.10.2011 20:02, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: A> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 07:43:33PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote: A> > A> On 13.10.2011 18:02, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: A> > A> >

Re: new CARP implementation

2011-10-14 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 08:14:34PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote: A> On 14.10.2011 20:02, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: A> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 07:43:33PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote: A> > A> On 13.10.2011 18:02, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: A> > A> > Hello networkers, A> > A> > A> > A> > I've upda

Re: new CARP implementation

2011-10-14 Thread Andre Oppermann
On 14.10.2011 20:02, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 07:43:33PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote: A> On 13.10.2011 18:02, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: A> > Hello networkers, A> > A> > I've updated patch& README here: A> > A> > http://people.freebsd.org/~glebius/newcarp/ A> >

Re: new CARP implementation

2011-10-14 Thread Andre Oppermann
On 13.10.2011 18:02, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: Hello networkers, I've updated patch& README here: http://people.freebsd.org/~glebius/newcarp/ Going to commit it to head/ soon. Then I'd like to make a run through carp-related PRs, update documentation, settle things a bit... and then ma

Re: new CARP implementation

2011-10-14 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 07:43:33PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote: A> On 13.10.2011 18:02, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: A> >Hello networkers, A> > A> >I've updated patch& README here: A> > A> >http://people.freebsd.org/~glebius/newcarp/ A> > A> >Going to commit it to head/ soon. Then I'd lik

Re: new CARP implementation

2011-10-13 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
Hello networkers, I've updated patch & README here: http://people.freebsd.org/~glebius/newcarp/ Going to commit it to head/ soon. Then I'd like to make a run through carp-related PRs, update documentation, settle things a bit... and then make more hacking to restore the arpbalance featur

Re: new CARP implementation

2011-08-15 Thread Julian Elischer
On 8/15/11 5:07 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: Hi David and networkers, On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 03:56:28PM -0500, David Duchscher wrote: D> > On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 07:32:06PM -0500, David Duchscher wrote: D> > D> My two cents. D> > D> D> > D> We rely on the arp load balance feature. We

Re: new CARP implementation

2011-08-15 Thread David Duchscher
On Aug 15, 2011, at 8:28 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 07:56:14AM -0500, David Duchscher wrote: > D> > On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 03:56:28PM -0500, David Duchscher wrote: > D> > D> > On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 07:32:06PM -0500, David Duchscher wrote: > D> > D> > D> My two cents. > D

Re: new CARP implementation

2011-08-15 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 07:56:14AM -0500, David Duchscher wrote: D> > On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 03:56:28PM -0500, David Duchscher wrote: D> > D> > On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 07:32:06PM -0500, David Duchscher wrote: D> > D> > D> My two cents. D> > D> > D> D> > D> > D> We rely on the arp load balance fea

Re: new CARP implementation

2011-08-15 Thread David Duchscher
On Aug 15, 2011, at 7:07 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > Hi David and networkers, > > On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 03:56:28PM -0500, David Duchscher wrote: > D> > On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 07:32:06PM -0500, David Duchscher wrote: > D> > D> My two cents. > D> > D> > D> > D> We rely on the arp load balance f

Re: new CARP implementation

2011-08-15 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
Hi David and networkers, On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 03:56:28PM -0500, David Duchscher wrote: D> > On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 07:32:06PM -0500, David Duchscher wrote: D> > D> My two cents. D> > D> D> > D> We rely on the arp load balance feature. We certainly don't find it useless. Looking at ip loa

Re: new CARP implementation

2011-08-14 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 07:32:06PM -0500, David Duchscher wrote: D> My two cents. D> D> We rely on the arp load balance feature. We certainly don't find it useless. Looking at ip load balancing, it would also mean that we would no longer be able to grow bandwidth with additional systems since

Re: new CARP implementation

2011-08-14 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 11:04:14PM -0700, Rudy (bulk) wrote: R> > I'd like to present for review and early testing (for brave ones) R> > a new CARP implementation. R> R> Super! I'll use it but am not brave enough for alpha. Maybe beta. :) R> R> Will this support multiple VHID per interface?

Re: new CARP implementation

2011-08-13 Thread David Duchscher
My two cents. We rely on the arp load balance feature. We certainly don't find it useless. Looking at ip load balancing, it would also mean that we would no longer be able to grow bandwidth with additional systems since all boxes must receive all traffic. I only humbling ask that some sort of

Re: new CARP implementation

2011-08-12 Thread Rudy (bulk)
Gleb Smirnoff wrote: Hello networkers, I'd like to present for review and early testing (for brave ones) a new CARP implementation. Super! I'll use it but am not brave enough for alpha. Maybe beta. :) Will this support multiple VHID per interface? Rudy _

Re: new CARP implementation

2011-08-11 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 02:47:08PM -0700, Freddie Cash wrote: F> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 09:38:04AM -0700, Freddie Cash wrote: F> > F> However, I'm not sure I understand the reasoning for removing the carpX F> > F> pseudo-interface. It's really nice having the symmetry between carpX, F> > F> vla

Re: new CARP implementation

2011-08-11 Thread Freddie Cash
2011/8/11 Gleb Smirnoff > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 09:38:04AM -0700, Freddie Cash wrote: > F> However, I'm not sure I understand the reasoning for removing the carpX > F> pseudo-interface. It's really nice having the symmetry between carpX, > F> vlanX, brX, and other pseudo-interfaces, and keepin

Re: new CARP implementation

2011-08-11 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 09:38:04AM -0700, Freddie Cash wrote: F> However, I'm not sure I understand the reasoning for removing the carpX F> pseudo-interface. It's really nice having the symmetry between carpX, F> vlanX, brX, and other pseudo-interfaces, and keeping the configuration F> details sep

Re: new CARP implementation

2011-08-10 Thread Freddie Cash
2011/8/10 Gleb Smirnoff > I'd like to present for review and early testing (for brave ones) > a new CARP implementation. The reason for this rewrite was that CARP > protocol actually doesn't bring a new interface, but is a property of > interface address. Rewriting it in this way helps to remov