Re: ndis: fix ugly code

2010-10-05 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 10/6/10, Julian Elischer wrote: > On 10/5/10 5:27 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: >> On 10/5/10, Julian Elischer wrote: >>>On 10/5/10 1:19 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: Hi, If clang did not complain, I would probbaly never spot it. Patch attached. >>> personally I think you co

Re: ndis: fix ugly code

2010-10-05 Thread Julian Elischer
On 10/5/10 5:27 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: On 10/5/10, Julian Elischer wrote: On 10/5/10 1:19 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: Hi, If clang did not complain, I would probbaly never spot it. Patch attached. personally I think you could use kproc_kthread_add so that a single NDIS process had three th

Re: ndis: fix ugly code

2010-10-05 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 10/5/10, Julian Elischer wrote: > On 10/5/10 1:19 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: >> Hi, >> >> If clang did not complain, I would probbaly never spot it. >> >> Patch attached. > > personally I think you could use kproc_kthread_add so that a single > NDIS process had three threads. Patch attached. No

Re: ndis: fix ugly code

2010-10-05 Thread Andrew Thompson
On 6 October 2010 09:19, Paul B Mahol wrote: > Hi, > > If clang did not complain, I would probbaly never spot it. > > Patch attached. Committed. ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscrib

Re: ndis: fix ugly code

2010-10-05 Thread Julian Elischer
On 10/5/10 1:19 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote: Hi, If clang did not complain, I would probbaly never spot it. Patch attached. personally I think you could use kproc_kthread_add so that a single NDIS process had three threads. ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.