"Crist J. Clark" wrote:
> Why not?
>
> map if0 192.168.100.0/24 -> 192.0.2.10/32 portmap tcp/udp auto
> map if0 192.168.100.0/24 -> 192.0.2.10/32
> bimap if0 192.168.100.1/32 -> 192.0.2.10/32
> map if0 172.16.0.0/16 -> 192.0.2.12/32 portmap tcp/udp auto
> map if0 172.16.0.0/16 -> 192.0
"Crist J. Clark" wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 12:44:26PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> > > I forgot point out that ipnat(8) will do this as-is if that is an
> > > option for you.
> >
> > Hmm, I've read man ipnat and still not sure how can I achieve
> > a combination of redirection ip<->ip
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 12:44:26PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> > I forgot point out that ipnat(8) will do this as-is if that is an
> > option for you.
>
> Hmm, I've read man ipnat and still not sure how can I achieve
> a combination of redirection ip<->ip and map net<->ip.
Why not?
map i
> I forgot point out that ipnat(8) will do this as-is if that is an
> option for you.
Hmm, I've read man ipnat and still not sure how can I achieve
a combination of redirection ip<->ip and map net<->ip.
Eugene
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 04:26:19PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> "Crist J. Clark" wrote:
>
> > > Would it be hard to implement this?
> >
> > Probably not too bad. Apparently no stampede for this functionality
> > though. There usually is not a lot to gain by mapping different
> > internal netw
"Crist J. Clark" wrote:
> > Would it be hard to implement this?
>
> Probably not too bad. Apparently no stampede for this functionality
> though. There usually is not a lot to gain by mapping different
> internal networks to different external addresses except maybe some
> warm fuzzies.
Conside
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 02:31:12PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> "Crist J. Clark" wrote:
>
> > > Suppose we have many tens of separated private networks each having its own
> > > public address and own gateway. Is is possible to configure natd to do
> > > static nat for network masks, not only
"Crist J. Clark" wrote:
> > Suppose we have many tens of separated private networks each having its own
> > public address and own gateway. Is is possible to configure natd to do
> > static nat for network masks, not only for sets of hosts? I'd like to
> > say:
> >
> > redirect_address 172.20.2.0
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 12:30:02PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> Hi!
>
> man natd says it's possible to implement static nat with one public address
> for the set of private hosts. It's very useful.
>
> Suppose we have many tens of separated private networks each having its own
> public addre
