Re: named in a sand box.

2000-12-15 Thread Maxim Konovalov
Hello, On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Peter Brezny wrote: > I have a nomenclature ignorance when it comes to the term sandbox. > > When someone says, "named runs in a sandbox on my machine." > > Do they mean > > a) named runs under an unpriviliged user > or > b) named runs in a chrooted environment >

Re: named in a sand box.

2000-12-15 Thread Chris Costello
On Friday, December 15, 2000, Matthew Emmerton wrote: > However, with the advent of chroot and the security gains that it provides, > "sandbox" has been re-defined to mean b) in most cases. chroot is not meant as a security mechanism, it was only meant to change the meaning of "/", originally

Re: named in a sand box.

2000-12-15 Thread Matthew Emmerton
> I have a nomenclature ignorance when it comes to the term sandbox. > > When someone says, "named runs in a sandbox on my machine." > > Do they mean > > a) named runs under an unpriviliged user > or > b) named runs in a chrooted environment > or > c) both At one point in time, "sandbox" meant a)