Uhm ... what was the intended content of your message?
And ... the RADIX_MPATH code is now considerably more flexible than just ECMP.
-Kip
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 8:10 PM, J. Hellenthal wrote:
> Hmmm funny, seems the mailing list is now stripping my address and
> moving posts to the top.
>
> O
Hmmm funny, seems the mailing list is now stripping my address and
moving posts to the top.
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 06:15:19PM +0200, K. Macy wrote:
> The weights of the links can be changed at run time. If one link is
> not passing traffic its weight should be set to zero until such time
> as it
The weights of the links can be changed at run time. If one link is
not passing traffic its weight should be set to zero until such time
as it is passing traffic again.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 6:13 PM, Nikolay Denev wrote:
> On Apr 6, 2011, at 5:36 PM, Michael Proto wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011
On Apr 6, 2011, at 5:36 PM, Michael Proto wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 8:02 AM, J. Hellenthal wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 01:45:54PM +0400, Eir Nym wrote:
>>> On 1 April 2011 21:27, Baginski Darren wrote:
Hi!
Could please someone tell me about current state of multiple g
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 8:02 AM, J. Hellenthal wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 01:45:54PM +0400, Eir Nym wrote:
>> On 1 April 2011 21:27, Baginski Darren wrote:
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> > Could please someone tell me about current state of multiple gw
>> > capabilities of FreeBSD?
>> > I have dual homed
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 01:45:54PM +0400, Eir Nym wrote:
> On 1 April 2011 21:27, Baginski Darren wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Could please someone tell me about current state of multiple gw
> > capabilities of FreeBSD?
> > I have dual homed FreeBSD box, one interface ISP1 another ISP2 :
> > 1) can I b
Eir Nym wrote:
On 1 April 2011 21:27, Baginski Darren wrote:
Hi!
Could please someone tell me about current state of multiple gw capabilities of
FreeBSD?
I have dual homed FreeBSD box, one interface ISP1 another ISP2 :
1) can I balance outgoing traffic across them ?
2) Is there support of any
On 1 April 2011 21:27, Baginski Darren wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Could please someone tell me about current state of multiple gw capabilities
> of FreeBSD?
> I have dual homed FreeBSD box, one interface ISP1 another ISP2 :
> 1) can I balance outgoing traffic across them ?
> 2) Is there support of any kind
Peter J. Blok writes:
> I know this topic has been brought up numerous times. I have 4 IP4 internal
> networks (sf0 .. sf3)
>
> I have a cable modem connection ep0 and a DSL ep1 connection too. I'd like to
> route all traffic from sf0 and sf1 to the DSL connection and the others to
> the cabl
You an do this for OUTGOING packets using ipfw and teh 'fwd' keyword.
(it can be used to override 'next hop' routing decisions.)
INCOMING is a whole different problem.
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Peter J. Blok wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know this topic has been brought up numerous times. I have 4 IP4 intern
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 11:29:17PM +0200, Peter J. Blok wrote:
> Since this seems not possible with the both stable and current, I would like
> to make a solution for it, inside the kernel. I am thinking of creating a
> routing table based on source address and designate the right gateway.
man
11 matches
Mail list logo
