On 5/19/13 11:59 PM, Haven Hash wrote:
Was m_fibnum being defined to m_hdr.mh_nextpkt intended? (it doesn't appear
to be used here and it seemed an odd mapping to me).
it is wrong and unused
it was not supposed to get committed
I plan to remove it
Thanks,
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 4:56 AM, J
Was m_fibnum being defined to m_hdr.mh_nextpkt intended? (it doesn't appear
to be used here and it seemed an odd mapping to me).
Thanks,
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 4:56 AM, Julian Elischer
wrote:
> Index: sys/conf/NOTES
> ===
> --- sy