Re: more FIBs patch for review

2013-05-20 Thread Julian Elischer
On 5/19/13 11:59 PM, Haven Hash wrote: Was m_fibnum being defined to m_hdr.mh_nextpkt intended? (it doesn't appear to be used here and it seemed an odd mapping to me). it is wrong and unused it was not supposed to get committed I plan to remove it Thanks, On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 4:56 AM, J

Re: more FIBs patch for review

2013-05-19 Thread Haven Hash
Was m_fibnum being defined to m_hdr.mh_nextpkt intended? (it doesn't appear to be used here and it seemed an odd mapping to me). Thanks, On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 4:56 AM, Julian Elischer wrote: > Index: sys/conf/NOTES > === > --- sy