I think that you're request to not monopolize the AF_INET slot is
reasonable. Do you intend to merge bms_netdev before 8 branches (I'm
guessing this coming summer)?
Cheers,
Kip
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just skimming this I notice it uses the if_afdata[
Hi,
Just skimming this I notice it uses the if_afdata[AF_INET] pointer
purely for lltbl purposes; this clashes with the IGMPv3 code drop.
Please look in the bms_netdev branch, where I introduce a 'struct
ip_ifinfo' to make more general use of that slot. IGMPv3 needs to store
per-interface st
On Wednesday 10 December 2008 10:30:35 Kip Macy wrote:
> > The reason I am asking is that people are still seeing panics from
> > the rnh locking and aren't even able to boot machines.
>
> I have not seen this. Please tell me where this occurs.
I had a machine with defaultrouter from /etc/rc.conf
> The reason I am asking is that people are still seeing panics from
> the rnh locking and aren't even able to boot machines.
I have not seen this. Please tell me where this occurs.
> Mixng route
> locking bugs with this rewrite will be painful. As I hope that the
> rnh bugs will be solved within
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008, Qing Li wrote:
Hi,
It's becoming increasingly difficult to maintain a separate
branch (p4 or svn) due to the high volume of new features'
related commits. The integration and unit testing efforts
increase in complexity by the week.
[..]
I would like to commit the code w
