Re: [fbsd] Re: jail addresses and default bindings

2006-12-27 Thread Gergely CZUCZY
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 04:56:38PM +0100, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 10:13:00AM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > > >this way it's hard to distingvish in a packet filter(let's say pf), > > >among connections originating from within the jail itself or > > >from the host system to t

Re: [fbsd] Re: jail addresses and default bindings

2006-12-27 Thread Jeremie Le Hen
On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 10:13:00AM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > >this way it's hard to distingvish in a packet filter(let's say pf), > >among connections originating from within the jail itself or > >from the host system to the jail. > > I won't ask why you would want to do that if you control i

Re: jail addresses and default bindings

2006-12-16 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006, Gergely CZUCZY wrote: Hi, whenever i try to connect to a port of a jail from the host system, the kernel automaticly assigns the jail's IP address as the source address to the socket. I'd assume that this is not a so welcomed behaviour, because it is because that's the w