Re: ipfw and ipv6: "me"

2011-09-05 Thread Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, > On Mon, 5 Sep 2011 16:35:06 +0200 > Ivan Voras said: ivoras> So "tcp from me to any..." appears to match both... which would be ivoras> fine, but then how do we match ipv4 only? `ip4 from me to any proto tcp' should do the job. Sincerely, -- Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid

Re: ipfw and ipv6: "me"

2011-09-05 Thread Willem Jan Withagen
On 5-9-2011 16:35, Ivan Voras wrote: > On 5 September 2011 16:01, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 02:37:08PM +0200 I heard the voice of >> Ivan Voras, and lo! it spake thus: >>> >>> There is no symmetrical "me4" option which leads me to think that >>> "me" matches only ipv4 and

Re: ipfw and ipv6: "me"

2011-09-05 Thread Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, > On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 14:37:08 +0200 > Ivan Voras said: ivoras> There is no symmetrical "me4" option which leads me to think that "me" ivoras> matches only ipv4 and "me6" only ipv6. There is `me6' for rather backward compatibility. Sincerely, -- Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Ai

Re: ipfw and ipv6: "me"

2011-09-05 Thread Ivan Voras
On 5 September 2011 16:01, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: > On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 02:37:08PM +0200 I heard the voice of > Ivan Voras, and lo! it spake thus: >> >> There is no symmetrical "me4" option which leads me to think that >> "me" matches only ipv4 and "me6" only ipv6. > > I can't answer for the

Re: ipfw and ipv6: "me"

2011-09-05 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 02:37:08PM +0200 I heard the voice of Ivan Voras, and lo! it spake thus: > > There is no symmetrical "me4" option which leads me to think that > "me" matches only ipv4 and "me6" only ipv6. I can't answer for the code, but as far as I could tell as a user that's the case.