RE: interface ip arp

2011-05-03 Thread Li, Qing
2, 2011 9:06 AM > To: Li, Qing > Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Ingo Flaschberger > Subject: Re: interface ip arp > > Hi, > > On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 4:03 AM, Li, Qing wrote: > > Please give this patch a try for IPv4 ARP > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~qingli

Re: interface ip arp

2011-05-02 Thread Arnaud Lacombe
Lacombe > Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Ingo Flaschberger > Subject: RE: interface ip arp > > Your patch doesn't work because the in_lltable_prefix_free() is  a generic > function. > > The static entries are kept only when issuing if-down command, however, if > the interfac

RE: interface ip arp

2011-05-02 Thread Li, Qing
-net@freebsd.org; Ingo Flaschberger Subject: RE: interface ip arp Your patch doesn't work because the in_lltable_prefix_free() is a generic function. The static entries are kept only when issuing if-down command, however, if the interface address is being removed, permanent static entries are

RE: interface ip arp

2011-05-02 Thread Li, Qing
rking patch for IPv4, just going over the IPv6 code. I will post the patch in a few minutes. -- Qing From: Arnaud Lacombe [lacom...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 12:41 AM To: Li, Qing Cc: Ingo Flaschberger; freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: interfa

Re: interface ip arp

2011-05-02 Thread Arnaud Lacombe
Hi, On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Li, Qing wrote: > jeez, this bug has been around for quite a while ... > > Please try patch at  http://people.freebsd.org/~qingli/arp.patch > d'oh!... Concerning Ingo's bug, your patch do the job, my report was bad, 4.9-RELEASE and 7.x show the same behavior:

Re: interface ip arp

2011-05-01 Thread Arnaud Lacombe
roduced in 8.x always behaved in such a way. - Arnaud >  - Arnaud > >> -- Qing >> >> >> From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org] on >> behalf of Li, Qing >> Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2011 4:54 PM >> To: I

Re: interface ip arp

2011-05-01 Thread Arnaud Lacombe
interface is brought down. - Arnaud > -- Qing > > > From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org] on behalf > of Li, Qing > Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2011 4:54 PM > To: Ingo Flaschberger > Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd

RE: interface ip arp

2011-05-01 Thread Li, Qing
: Ingo Flaschberger Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: interface ip arp That's not the expected behavior, probably a bug, I will take a look ... -- Qing On May 1, 2011, at 4:51 PM, "Ingo Flaschberger" wrote: >> is it expected behaviour that the static, perma

Re: interface ip arp

2011-05-01 Thread Arnaud Lacombe
Hi, On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Li, Qing wrote: > That's not the expected behavior, probably a bug, I will take a look ... > I just check on several version. HEAD has the same behavior, 4.9-RELEASE and a custom 7.1 keep the permanent ARP entry. In case that matter, HEAD was tested on top of e

Re: interface ip arp

2011-05-01 Thread Li, Qing
That's not the expected behavior, probably a bug, I will take a look ... -- Qing On May 1, 2011, at 4:51 PM, "Ingo Flaschberger" wrote: >> is it expected behaviour that the static, permanent arp entry of the >> interface ip disappear after ifdown/ifup at 8.x release? >> >> ifconfig em0 10.

Re: interface ip arp

2011-05-01 Thread Ingo Flaschberger
is it expected behaviour that the static, permanent arp entry of the interface ip disappear after ifdown/ifup at 8.x release? ifconfig em0 10.20.20.1/24 arp -an | grep 10.20.20.1 ? (10.20.20.1) at xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx on em0 permanent [ethernet] ifconfig em0 down ifconfig em0 up arp -an | grep 10.2