On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
RE>On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 03:23:09PM +0100, Harti Brandt wrote:
RE>> On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
...
RE>>
RE>I've just committed this feature.
RE>
RE>> Just one question:
RE>> is there any locking that does a user process prevent from see
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 03:23:09PM +0100, Harti Brandt wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>
> RE>On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 10:41:58AM +0100, Harti Brandt wrote:
> RE>> On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> RE>>
> RE>> RE>On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 06:58:26PM +0100, Harti Brandt
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
RE>On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 10:41:58AM +0100, Harti Brandt wrote:
RE>> On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
RE>>
RE>> RE>On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 06:58:26PM +0100, Harti Brandt wrote:
RE>> RE>>
RE>> RE>> Hi,
RE>> RE>>
RE>> RE>> how is a daemon suppos
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 10:41:58AM +0100, Harti Brandt wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>
> RE>On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 06:58:26PM +0100, Harti Brandt wrote:
> RE>>
> RE>> Hi,
> RE>>
> RE>> how is a daemon supposed to get informed that a network interface has been
> RE>> created
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
RE>On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 06:58:26PM +0100, Harti Brandt wrote:
RE>>
RE>> Hi,
RE>>
RE>> how is a daemon supposed to get informed that a network interface has been
RE>> created? I had hoped, that an RTM_IFINFO message would be created on the
RE>> routing
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 06:58:26PM +0100, Harti Brandt wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> how is a daemon supposed to get informed that a network interface has been
> created? I had hoped, that an RTM_IFINFO message would be created on the
> routing socket, but this is not the case. If an interface is destroyed
