The ims_merge function is invoked only when the imsl_st[0] and imsl_st[1]
are different i.e. a filter mode change. The new filter mode is updated in
ims_st[1].
Thanks for the clarification.
Thanks
Dheeraj
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 9:58 AM Dheeraj Kandula wrote:
> Thanks, HPS for the response. I t
Thanks, HPS for the response. I think the index 0 is for a state (previous
to current) and 1 indicates the current state. I am still trying to figure
out what they really mean. Maybe reading the RFC will shed some light on
the intention.
My understanding is that the state transition is from index
On 2020-10-12 19:11, Dheeraj Kandula wrote:
On line 987 and 991 shouldn't the index be 0 instead of 1.
i.e. ims->ims_st[0].ex -= n;
and
ims->ims_st[0].in -= n;
On a rollback, the entry at index 0 is incremented and the entry at index 1
is decremented.
On a non-rollback merge, the entry at inde
