On Wednesday, 12 May 2004 at 02:53:02, Hajimu UMETO wrote:
Lukasz>> I will *try* to look at it if you don't mind.
[...]
HU> A friend of mine tested this patch on his 4-STABLE box.
It's been some time but i have looked at this and... "There is
always one more bug."
I have one ethernet card in m
Hi,
> On Tue, 11 May 2004 18:07:34 +0200
> Lukasz Stelmach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Lukasz> In one of my previous letters I have mentioned that i use 4.9-RCsomething
Lukasz> and unfortunately this is my only FreeBSD. I am also afraid :-( that
Lukasz> i don't have enough spare time neithe
On Tue, 11 May 2004 18:59:31 +0900 Ume wrote:
> On Thu, 6 May 2004 10:21:13 +0200
> Lukasz Stelmach said:
Lukasz>> Well i *have*got* one v4ADDR that is assigned to my nat/router-box. I
[...]
Lukasz>> harm. Let's say taht to the rest of the world the nat+TIGGER act like
Lukasz>> a single m
Hi,
> On Thu, 6 May 2004 10:21:13 +0200
> Lukasz Stelmach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Lukasz> Well i *have*got* one v4ADDR that is assigned to my nat/router-box. I
Lukasz> have also configured that it should pass all packets that are not part
Lukasz> of some known connections (from M1 M2 .
Byla godzina 16:00:42 w Thursday 06 May, gdy do autobusu wsiadl kanar
i wrzasnal:"SUZUKI Shinsuke!!! Bilecik do kontroli!!!" A on(a) na to:
>> On Tue, 4 May 2004 20:16:20 +0200
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED](Lukasz Stelmach) said:
>
> > stf interface has one feature, very inconvinient for me. As
Hello, and Sorry for a delayed answer.
> On Tue, 4 May 2004 20:16:20 +0200
> [EMAIL PROTECTED](Lukasz Stelmach) said:
> stf interface has one feature, very inconvinient for me. As far as i could
> read the source it returns ENETDOWN if the inet4 address of the machine's
> net interface (
