Ian Dowse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Another important reason to add this feature is for compatibility
> with other platforms' getaddrinfo() implementations. I just tried
> a random Linux box here, and it seems to have very similar behaviour
> to that implemented by my patch. There is also the
>>I'd very much like to see PF_LOCAL support added to our getaddrinfo()
>>and getnameinfo(). I know that PF_LOCAL sockets have semantics that
>Here is quick and simple implementation - any comments welcome. It
>probably needs a few changes to match the conventions of other
>implementations, and a
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ian Dowse writes:
>
>I'd very much like to see PF_LOCAL support added to our getaddrinfo()
>and getnameinfo(). I know that PF_LOCAL sockets have semantics that
Here is quick and simple implementation - any comments welcome. It
probably needs a few changes to match
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bernd Walter writes:
>> Our getaddrinfo(3) doesn't support AF_UNIX.
>
>Arg - I looked into src/contrib/bin/lib/irs/getaddrinfo.c
>The one in libc is different...
I'd very much like to see PF_LOCAL support added to our getaddrinfo()
and getnameinfo(). I know that PF
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 12:42:17AM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> > On Sat, 14 Jul 2001 13:49:55 +0200
> > Bernd Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> ticso> ip = "/var/run/something"; portname = "/local";
> ticso> results in:
> ticso> getaddrinfo failed: servname not supported for ai_sock
> On Sat, 14 Jul 2001 13:49:55 +0200
> Bernd Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
ticso> ip = "/var/run/something"; portname = "/local";
ticso> results in:
ticso> getaddrinfo failed: servname not supported for ai_socktype
ticso> ip = "/var/run/something"; portname = NULL;
ticso> results in: