On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 19:18:06 +0400
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
That's strange. Per-minute read shouldn't induce
large CPU load.
What snmp daemon do you use? I remember that several
years ago net-snmp daemon from ports used a single
linked list for all ARP entries, and thus it consumed a lot
of CPU w
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 09:41:19PM +0700, Ivan Alexandrovich wrote:
I> Hi
I>
I> We are running freebsd9.0 on a router with
I> more than 1000 of subscriber's vlan interfaces.
I> Outgoing packet rate is approximately 40 kpps.
I>
I> There's a need to collect bytes and packets
I> counters for all tho
Hi
Thanks for your replies.
Mike Tancsa mike at sentex.net wrote:
We approach it a little differently and collect all the data via
netflow, or in this case argus.
Netflow is fine. We used ng_netflow with ng_vlan on a previous
installation with FreeBSD-6.x and it worked fine.
Then we had to d
.. you just have to make sure you get the locking right. Especially if
you're walking lists of interfaces and getting protocol stats from a
device that's dynamically creating/deleting network interfaces (eg ppp
stuff.)
Adrian
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.or
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> On 9/16/2012 10:41 AM, Ivan Alexandrovich wrote:
>>
>> We are running freebsd9.0 on a router with
>> more than 1000 of subscriber's vlan interfaces.
>> Outgoing packet rate is approximately 40 kpps.
>>
>> There's a need to collect bytes and pac
On 9/16/2012 10:41 AM, Ivan Alexandrovich wrote:
> Hi
>
> We are running freebsd9.0 on a router with
> more than 1000 of subscriber's vlan interfaces.
> Outgoing packet rate is approximately 40 kpps.
>
> There's a need to collect bytes and packets
> counters for all those vlan interfaces every
>
