Am not positive, why don't you test it and see? Was there a change that had
been proposed to fix this?
Thanks,
Jack
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 1:23 AM, Hooman Fazaeli wrote:
> Dear Jack
>
> Is the problem related to link loss fixed in this version?
> The problem was that if if_snd fills up during
Dear Jack
Is the problem related to link loss fixed in this version?
The problem was that if if_snd fills up during a "link_active == 0"
period, stack never calls em_start again, because em does not
kick off tx when link becomes active again.
On 1/29/2012 9:51 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
No, I told
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 01:50:23PM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote:
> Huh? I MFC'd into stable/8 does that show up as RELENG?
I suspect different SCMs here is causing terminology confusion. RELENG_8
is the CVS version of the stable/8 branch in SVN.
Gary
___
f
Normally, except I have real world customers that have explicitly told me
they
needed something in 8.3 whereas no one has said they cared about stable/9,
that's why I did it first, I've never been aware that there was some
'trickle-down'
hierarchy, have always assumed its head or its stable :)
Jac
On Wednesday, February 01, 2012 4:50:23 pm Jack Vogel wrote:
> Huh? I MFC'd into stable/8 does that show up as RELENG? And, I had planned
> to
> put it into stable/9 just hadn't gotten to it yet. Making sure the drivers
> are in 8.3 seems
> to be the most wanted target.
Err, normally things are me
Huh? I MFC'd into stable/8 does that show up as RELENG? And, I had planned
to
put it into stable/9 just hadn't gotten to it yet. Making sure the drivers
are in 8.3 seems
to be the most wanted target.
Jack
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> On 1/29/2012 1:21 PM, Jack Vogel wro
On 1/29/2012 1:21 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> No, I told Mike I'd get it into 8.x, have just been busy, but will try
> and get it pushed up in the queue.
Thanks Jack, I see its now MFC'd into RELENG_8!
em1: port 0x2000-0x201f mem
0xb410-0xb411,0xb412-0xb4123fff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pc
On Sunday, January 29, 2012 4:38:39 am Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Freebsd-net.
>
> My home server lost connection on em0 this night again. It was
> persistent problem some times ago, but with version 7.2.3 it is first
> time, but with worse symptoms.
>
> It looks like undetected hardware
Yes, the whole reason to get it into that stable is to make the 8.3 release.
Jack
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> On 1/29/12 7:21 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> > No, I told Mike I'd get it into 8.x, have just been busy, but will try
> > and get it pushed up in the queue.
>
On 1/29/12 7:21 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> No, I told Mike I'd get it into 8.x, have just been busy, but will try
> and get it pushed up in the queue.
>
> Jack
>
>
> 2012/1/29 Lev Serebryakov
>
>> Hello, Mike.
>> You wrote 29 января 2012 г., 16:54:59:
>>
My home server lost connection on e
No, I told Mike I'd get it into 8.x, have just been busy, but will try
and get it pushed up in the queue.
Jack
2012/1/29 Lev Serebryakov
> Hello, Mike.
> You wrote 29 января 2012 г., 16:54:59:
>
> >> My home server lost connection on em0 this night again. It was
> >> persistent problem some
Hello, Mike.
You wrote 29 января 2012 г., 16:54:59:
>> My home server lost connection on em0 this night again. It was
>> persistent problem some times ago, but with version 7.2.3 it is first
>> time, but with worse symptoms.
> 7.3.0 from HEAD is quite stable for me. Hopefully it will be MFC'd s
On 1/29/2012 4:38 AM, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Freebsd-net.
>
> My home server lost connection on em0 this night again. It was
> persistent problem some times ago, but with version 7.2.3 it is first
> time, but with worse symptoms.
7.3.0 from HEAD is quite stable for me. Hopefully it wi
13 matches
Mail list logo
