Re: em blues

2006-10-12 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 10:34 AM 10/12/2006, Danny Braniss wrote: > >short version: > >the point im trying to make, is that the same setup, where I only change > >the release, is going downhill - with this particular MB. > > But its not the same necessarily. Some of the settings are different. > For example, disable

Re: em blues

2006-10-12 Thread Danny Braniss
> >short version: > >the point im trying to make, is that the same setup, where I only change > >the release, is going downhill - with this particular MB. > > But its not the same necessarily. Some of the settings are different. > For example, disable net.inet.tcp.inflight.enable on 6.x if you wa

Re: em blues

2006-10-12 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 04:38 AM 10/12/2006, Danny Braniss wrote: short version: the point im trying to make, is that the same setup, where I only change the release, is going downhill - with this particular MB. But its not the same necessarily. Some of the settings are different. For example, disable net.inet.tc

Re: em blues

2006-10-12 Thread Danny Braniss
> Jack Vogel wrote: > > On 10/11/06, Danny Braniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> the box is a bit old (Intel Pentium III (933.07-MHz 686-class CPU) > >> dual cpu. > >> running iperf -c (receiving): > >> > >> freebsd-4.100.0-10.0 sec936 MBytes785 Mbits/sec > >> freebsd-5.4 0.0-10.

Re: em blues

2006-10-12 Thread Steven Hartland
Jack Vogel wrote: On 10/11/06, Danny Braniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: the box is a bit old (Intel Pentium III (933.07-MHz 686-class CPU) dual cpu. running iperf -c (receiving): freebsd-4.100.0-10.0 sec936 MBytes785 Mbits/sec freebsd-5.4 0.0-10.0 sec413 MBytes346 Mbits/

Re: em blues

2006-10-12 Thread Danny Braniss
> On 10/11/06, Danny Braniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > the box is a bit old (Intel Pentium III (933.07-MHz 686-class CPU) > > dual cpu. > > > > running iperf -c (receiving): > > > > freebsd-4.100.0-10.0 sec936 MBytes785 Mbits/sec > > freebsd-5.4 0.0-10.0 sec413 MBytes34

Re: em blues

2006-10-12 Thread Danny Braniss
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 16:06:17 +0200, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you > wrote: > > >the box is a bit old (Intel Pentium III (933.07-MHz 686-class CPU) > >dual cpu. > > > >running iperf -c (receiving): >freebsd-4.10 0.0-10.0 sec936 MBytes785 Mbits/sec >freebsd-5.40.0-10.0 sec41

Re: em blues

2006-10-11 Thread Mike Tancsa
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 16:06:17 +0200, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you wrote: >the box is a bit old (Intel Pentium III (933.07-MHz 686-class CPU) >dual cpu. > >running iperf -c (receiving): > >freebsd-4.10 0.0-10.0 sec936 MBytes785 Mbits/sec >freebsd-5.40.0-10.0 sec413 MBytes346

Re: em blues

2006-10-11 Thread Jack Vogel
On 10/11/06, Danny Braniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: the box is a bit old (Intel Pentium III (933.07-MHz 686-class CPU) dual cpu. running iperf -c (receiving): freebsd-4.100.0-10.0 sec936 MBytes785 Mbits/sec freebsd-5.4 0.0-10.0 sec413 MBytes346 Mbits/sec freebsd.6.1