On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 01:22:36 +0100, Pyun YongHyeon
wrote:
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 11:54:49PM +0100, Ronald Klop wrote:
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 00:01:47 +0100, Ronald Klop
wrote:
>On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 09:38:04 +0100, wrote:
>
So, does anyone have an idea why the IP length field would be se
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 11:54:49PM +0100, Ronald Klop wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 00:01:47 +0100, Ronald Klop
> wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 09:38:04 +0100, wrote:
> >
> So, does anyone have an idea why the IP length field would be set to
> >>>0
> for these TCP/IP packets?
> >>
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 00:01:47 +0100, Ronald Klop
wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 09:38:04 +0100, wrote:
> So, does anyone have an idea why the IP length field would be set to
0
> for these TCP/IP packets?
>
> Here's some info from Ronald w.r.t. his hardware. (All I can think
of is
> that he
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 09:38:04 +0100, wrote:
> So, does anyone have an idea why the IP length field would be set to 0
> for these TCP/IP packets?
>
> Here's some info from Ronald w.r.t. his hardware. (All I can think of
is
> that he could try disabling TSO, etc?)
>
> Thanks in advance for any
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 07:35:30PM +0100, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
>> > > I'm seeing the same problem with Broadcom NetXtreme (bce) cards:
>> > >
>> > > bce0@pci0:3:0:0: class=0x02 card=0x03421014 chip=0x164c14e4
>> > > rev=0x12
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 07:35:30PM +0100, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
> > > I'm seeing the same problem with Broadcom NetXtreme (bce) cards:
> > >
> > > bce0@pci0:3:0:0:class=0x02 card=0x03421014 chip=0x164c14e4
> > > rev=0x12 hdr=0x00
> > > vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation'
> > >
> > I'm seeing the same problem with Broadcom NetXtreme (bce) cards:
> >
> > bce0@pci0:3:0:0:class=0x02 card=0x03421014 chip=0x164c14e4
> > rev=0x12 hdr=0x00
> > vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation'
> > device = 'Broadcom NetXtreme II Gigabit Ethernet Adapter (BCM5708)'
> >
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 09:38:04AM +0100, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
> > > So, does anyone have an idea why the IP length field would be set to 0
> > > for these TCP/IP packets?
> > >
> > > Here's some info from Ronald w.r.t. his hardware. (All I can think of is
> > > that he could try disabling TSO
> > So, does anyone have an idea why the IP length field would be set to 0
> > for these TCP/IP packets?
> >
> > Here's some info from Ronald w.r.t. his hardware. (All I can think of is
> > that he could try disabling TSO, etc?)
> >
> > Thanks in advance for any help with this, rick
> >
>
> It
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 08:54:59AM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote:
> Ronald has reported having a problem with the FreeBSD NFS client using
> 8.2-prerelease. I've redirected it here, since it looks like there is
> a TCP/IP issue that is causing it.
>
> >
> > >>
> > >> These are the links to the dumps:
10 matches
Mail list logo