Re: avoiding unnecessary route deletion in rt_fixchange()

2001-07-23 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
> On Mon, 23 Jul 2001 10:44:57 -0700, > "Bruce A. Mah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> As suggested in the comments to rt_fixchange(), we need stricter check >> in the function, to prevent unintentional route deletion. The >> attached is a proposed fix to this problem (for FreeBSD4-STABLE)

Re: avoiding unnecessary route deletion in rt_fixchange()

2001-07-23 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, JINMEI Tatuya / =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCP0BMQEMjOkgbKEI= ?= wrote: > As suggested in the comments to rt_fixchange(), we need stricter check > in the function, to prevent unintentional route deletion. The > attached is a proposed fix to this problem (for FreeBSD4-STABLE). >

Re: avoiding unnecessary route deletion in rt_fixchange()

2001-07-18 Thread Stephen Degler
Hi, Applied. I'll let you (and the list) know if I have any issues. Thanks, skd On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 03:43:41PM +0900, JINMEI Tatuya / ?$B?@L@C#:H?(B wrote: > As commented in defined in sys/net/route.c, rt_fixchange() has a bad > effect, which would cause unnecessary route deletion: > >

Re: avoiding unnecessary route deletion in rt_fixchange()

2001-07-18 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
Yay, cool! Unless Garrett commits this in a few days, I will on Friday. And yes, this fixes the "mysterious" problem when gwroute was not allocated when adding the "default" route. Thanks! On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 03:43:41PM +0900, JINMEI Tatuya / ?$B?@L@C#:H?(B wrote: > As commented in defined