Re: arp-v2 (void *)-1 "hack"

2008-12-28 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Sun, 28 Dec 2008, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: Hi, On Sun, 28 Dec 2008, Kip Macy wrote: Hi, What do you think wrt to adding the (possibly optional) int *error and returning the errno rather than a (void *)-1? If you'd be ok, I'd can prepare the patch. I'd rather break the API now than in a few

Re: arp-v2 (void *)-1 "hack"

2008-12-28 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Sun, 28 Dec 2008, Kip Macy wrote: Hi, What do you think wrt to adding the (possibly optional) int *error and returning the errno rather than a (void *)-1? If you'd be ok, I'd can prepare the patch. I'd rather break the API now than in a few months. I would greatly prefer having a dedicate

Re: arp-v2 (void *)-1 "hack"

2008-12-28 Thread Kip Macy
> What do you think wrt to adding the (possibly optional) int *error and > returning the errno rather than a (void *)-1? If you'd be ok, I'd can > prepare the patch. I'd rather break the API now than in a few months. I would greatly prefer having a dedicated new function that calls in to it. Ther