On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
> OK then if we know we have only one listenning socket,
> (I presume that's what SINGLE_LISTEN_UNSERIALIZED_ACCEPT means)
> then it just uses a raw accept right?
Yes.
> The proble we are seeing is apache occasionally has a process
> freeze while it h
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Marc Slemko wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> >
> > for FreeBSD we seem to get this option set..
> >
> > this seems bogus..
> >
> > it assumes that multiple processes can't listen on the accept
> > at one time...
>
> That is one use for accept s
> does anyone know if FreeBSD is safe for having multiple processes do
> accept() on the same listenning socket?
I wrote a program on FreeBSD several years ago that does exactly this with
multiple rforked child processes. In fact, someone recompiled my program
on FreeBSD 4.5 last month to mo
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> for FreeBSD we seem to get this option set..
>
> this seems bogus..
>
> it assumes that multiple processes can't listen on the accept
> at one time...
That is one use for accept serialization.
However, the other reason has to do with multiple
