Re: ZFS and 'traditional' nfs-export

2009-10-28 Thread Pawel Jakub Dawidek
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:46:00AM +0100, Arno J. Klaassen wrote: > > Hello, > > I googled a bit on this question but could not find > a clear answer : > > is there any risk/inconvenience/advantage in exporting > a ZFS-fs by just putting it in /etc/exports the old > way and leaving the 'sharenfs

Re: ZFS and 'traditional' nfs-export

2009-10-27 Thread Kris Kennaway
Arno J. Klaassen wrote: hello, "Larry Rosenman" writes: ZFS makes its own version of the exports file. Just do it that way, and be safe. You can pass the full set of NFS options in the sharenfs parameter ah ok, I see. Thanks for answering. I got fooled by the man zfs(1M) example :

Re: ZFS and 'traditional' nfs-export

2009-10-27 Thread Arno J. Klaassen
hello, "Larry Rosenman" writes: > ZFS makes its own version of the exports file. > > Just do it that way, and be safe. > > You can pass the full set of NFS options in the sharenfs parameter ah ok, I see. Thanks for answering. I got fooled by the man zfs(1M) example : zfs set sharenfs='r

RE: ZFS and 'traditional' nfs-export

2009-10-27 Thread Larry Rosenman
ZFS makes its own version of the exports file. Just do it that way, and be safe. You can pass the full set of NFS options in the sharenfs parameter -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683E-Mail: l...@lerctr.org US Mail: 430 V