On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:46:00AM +0100, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I googled a bit on this question but could not find
> a clear answer :
>
> is there any risk/inconvenience/advantage in exporting
> a ZFS-fs by just putting it in /etc/exports the old
> way and leaving the 'sharenfs
Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
hello,
"Larry Rosenman" writes:
ZFS makes its own version of the exports file.
Just do it that way, and be safe.
You can pass the full set of NFS options in the sharenfs parameter
ah ok, I see. Thanks for answering.
I got fooled by the man zfs(1M) example :
hello,
"Larry Rosenman" writes:
> ZFS makes its own version of the exports file.
>
> Just do it that way, and be safe.
>
> You can pass the full set of NFS options in the sharenfs parameter
ah ok, I see. Thanks for answering.
I got fooled by the man zfs(1M) example :
zfs set sharenfs='r
ZFS makes its own version of the exports file.
Just do it that way, and be safe.
You can pass the full set of NFS options in the sharenfs parameter
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 512-248-2683E-Mail: l...@lerctr.org
US Mail: 430 V