Re: Strange behaviour of route command

2007-09-17 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2007-09-17 10:45, Tom Judge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >>On 2007-09-10 14:05, Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>On 2007-09-10 02:03, Nuno Antunes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Tom Judge wrote: >>> Hi, >>> While making some changes to the routin

Re: Strange behaviour of route command

2007-09-17 Thread Nuno Antunes
On 9/17/07, Tom Judge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > On 2007-09-10 14:05, Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On 2007-09-10 02:03, Nuno Antunes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Tom Judge wrote: > >> Hi, > >> While making some changes to the routing

Re: Strange behaviour of route command

2007-09-17 Thread Tom Judge
Giorgos Keramidas wrote: On 2007-09-10 14:05, Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 2007-09-10 02:03, Nuno Antunes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Tom Judge wrote: Hi, While making some changes to the routing table on one of our routers today I noticed that "route add" was showing some st

Re: Strange behaviour of route command

2007-09-10 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2007-09-10 14:05, Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2007-09-10 02:03, Nuno Antunes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> Tom Judge wrote: > Hi, > While making some changes to the routing table on one of our routers > today I noticed that "route add" was showing some str

Re: Strange behaviour of route command

2007-09-10 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2007-09-10 02:03, Nuno Antunes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Tom Judge wrote: Hi, While making some changes to the routing table on one of our routers today I noticed that "route add" was showing some strange behaviour. When adding a route for 128/8 to the table rather than

Re: Strange behaviour of route command

2007-09-09 Thread Nuno Antunes
> > Tom Judge wrote: > >> Hi, > >> While making some changes to the routing table on one of our routers > >> today I noticed that "route add" was showing some strange > >> behaviour. When adding a route for 128/8 to the table rather than > >> adding 128.0.0.0/8 it would add 0.0.0.0/8, however addin

Re: Strange behaviour of route command

2007-09-07 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2007-09-07 16:57, "Bruce M. Simpson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tom Judge wrote: >> Hi, >> While making some changes to the routing table on one of our routers >> today I noticed that "route add" was showing some strange >> behaviour. When adding a route for 128/8 to the table rather than >> a

Re: Strange behaviour of route command

2007-09-07 Thread Bruce M. Simpson
Tom Judge wrote: Hi, While making some changes to the routing table on one of our routers today I noticed that "route add" was showing some strange behaviour. When adding a route for 128/8 to the table rather than adding 128.0.0.0/8 it would add 0.0.0.0/8, however adding 10/9 works correctly.