Re: Setup of jail bound to lo0

2005-03-21 Thread Sten Spans
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, [UTF-8] SÅ~Bawek Å»ak wrote: On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 10:47:25 +0100 (CET), Sten Spans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, [UTF-8] SÅ~Bawek Å»ak wrote: Hi, pf: # Tables: similar to macros, but more flexible for many addresses. table { 1.2.3.4, 5.6.7.8, 9.9.9.9 } # Trans

Re: Setup of jail bound to lo0

2005-03-21 Thread Sławek Żak
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 10:47:25 +0100 (CET), Sten Spans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, [UTF-8] SÅ~Bawek Å»ak wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I need to have some jails configured, sharing single IP address (IPv6 > > is a no-no for the time being:). Therefore I came up with an idea of > > b

Re: Setup of jail bound to lo0

2005-03-17 Thread GiZmen
> Hi, > > I need to have some jails configured, sharing single IP address (IPv6 > is a no-no for the time being:). Therefore I came up with an idea of > binding them all to lo0 and assigning subsequent IP aliases as the > addresses. The requirement for the jails is to let them to receive > (the ea

Re: Setup of jail bound to lo0

2005-03-16 Thread .
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ] > Hi, > > I need to have some jails configured, sharing single IP address (IPv6 > is a no-no for the time being:). Therefore I came up with an idea of > binding them all to lo0 and assigning subsequent IP aliases as the > addresses. The requirement

Re: Setup of jail bound to lo0

2005-03-16 Thread Sten Spans
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, [UTF-8] SÅ~Bawek Å»ak wrote: Hi, I need to have some jails configured, sharing single IP address (IPv6 is a no-no for the time being:). Therefore I came up with an idea of binding them all to lo0 and assigning subsequent IP aliases as the addresses. The requirement for the jail

Re: Setup of jail bound to lo0

2005-03-15 Thread Brian Reichert
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 12:27:57AM +0100, S??awek ??ak wrote: > Hi, > > I need to have some jails configured, sharing single IP address (IPv6 > is a no-no for the time being:). Therefore I came up with an idea of > binding them all to lo0 and assigning subsequent IP aliases as the > addresses. The