--- Original message ---
From: "Vladislav Prodan"
Date: 27 June 2014, 16:28:41
>
> Hello!
>
> and sends to gmail (dualstack – ipv4 and ipv6) through ipv4!
>
To gmail:
Return-Path:
Received: from [10.0.0.10] (otrada.od.ua. [89.209.81.54])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
Hello John-Mark and FreeBSD friends,
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 08:27:01PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> Willy Offermans wrote this message on Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 15:46 +0100:
> > Hello John-Mark and FreeBSD friends,
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 04:04:27PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> > >
Willy Offermans wrote this message on Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 15:46 +0100:
> Hello John-Mark and FreeBSD friends,
>
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 04:04:27PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> > Willy Offermans wrote this message on Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 18:22 +0100:
> > > Hello John-Mark and FreeBSD friends
When asked his whereabouts on Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 15:00 ,
Eicke took the fifth, drank it, and then slurred:
> Hi folks,
> I have a machine with FreeBSD 4.6 and Sendmail 8.12.3
> I need only sent e-mails using this machine. My rc.conf contents the
> following:
> sendmail_enable="NONE"
That disa
> Generally, sendmail uses flock() on the aliases file and related databases
> to ensure consistency. As far as I know, it's unrelated to redirection.
And for locking queue files.
> > Here is what Control-T does
> > load: 0.20 cmd: sendmail 292 [pause] 0.02u 0.04s 0% 2016k
>
> pause, eh? That
On Sun, 8 Jun 2003, David Yeske wrote:
> This is when sendmail is ran from virecover.
>
> Is this because sendmail is taking redirection, and it needs to flock()
> for that?
Generally, sendmail uses flock() on the aliases file and related databases
to ensure consistency. As far as I know, it'
This is when sendmail is ran from virecover.
Is this because sendmail is taking redirection,
and it needs to flock() for that?
I think a solution could be to make virecover called later on.
Why are rpc.lockd and rpc.statd not started directly after
rpcbind?
Here is some more output.
Recovering
On Sat, 7 Jun 2003, David Yeske wrote:
> Jun 8 00:52:33 photon sendmail[293]: h584pRfm000293: SYSERR(root): cannot
> flock(./tfh584pRfm000293, fd=5, type=6, omode=40001, euid=25^C.
> NFS access cache time=2
> Starting statd.
> Starting lockd.
>
> It looks like sendmail starts before rpc.lockd an
Jun 8 00:52:33 photon sendmail[293]: h584pRfm000293: SYSERR(root): cannot
flock(./tfh584pRfm000293, fd=5, type=6, omode=40001, euid=25^C.
NFS access cache time=2
Starting statd.
Starting lockd.
I should clarify that /etc/rc.d/virecover is calling sendmail.
Does virecover need to be called this ea
On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, John Angelmo wrote:
> I'm intrested in implementing sendmail with AUTH agains passwd, I have
> only been able to do this agains TSL with their database, has anyone
> tried agains passwd and got it to work?
One approach that has been used with success by many folks, me include
mi+mx> I set things up once some time ago for one of my machines to relay
mi+mx> e-mail from another -- based on SSL-certificate presented. I'm my
mi+mx> own issuer. The setup was working for a while, but broke recently --
mi+mx> the relay-to-be now rejects relaying, even though it verifies the
mi+
DNS problem?
==WWW.XGFORCE.COM The Next Generation Load
Balance and Fail Safe Server Clustering Softwarefor the
Internet.==
- Original Message -
From:
Cameron
Haegle
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: T
On Sat, 28 Apr 2001 10:22, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > >Well, I have had the same problem. The solution was in removing IPv6
> > >support. I have not done any futher investigations.
> >
> > please file a bug report to sendmail.org.
Hello,
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Well, I have had the same problem. The solution was in removing IPv6
> >support. I have not done any futher investigations.
>
> please file a bug report to sendmail.org.
It seems Sean Farley has already done the patch. Thank you Sean
>Well, I have had the same problem. The solution was in removing IPv6
>support. I have not done any futher investigations.
please file a bug report to sendmail.org.
itojun
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Hello,
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Sean Farley wrote:
> I previously posted this on comp.mail.sendmail and freebsd-questions.
> After no answer and some extra testing, I believe this probably belongs
> here.
>
>
>
> I need some help debugging a problem I am having with setting up Sendmail.
>
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001 12:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >I only wish it to receive on the LAN (192.168.1.0) and the analog modem
> >(216.140.158.72). This is easy to change (DAEMON_OPTIONS), but I just
> >can't get confCLIENT_OPTIONS to work. From looking at sendmail.cf, I can
> >see that it is b
>I only wish it to receive on the LAN (192.168.1.0) and the analog modem
>(216.140.158.72). This is easy to change (DAEMON_OPTIONS), but I just
>can't get confCLIENT_OPTIONS to work. From looking at sendmail.cf, I can
>see that it is being set:
>
># SMTP client options
>O ClientPortOptions=Famil
18 matches
Mail list logo
