On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 01:17:13PM +0200, Hartmut Brandt wrote:
> The problem is not the CPU horsepower. The problem is that you update
> these counters on each incoming packet. No problem for desktops, but if
> you want to route several 100kps this may hurt. I have no idea, how IPFW
> does it.
Eugene Grosbein wrote:
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 07:18:52PM +0200, Hartmut Brandt wrote:
I've just found that ports/net-snmp (version 5.4) built
WITH_MFD_REWRITES=yes supports IF-MIB, and in theory should show 64-bit
ifHC* counters but it does not.
It seems agent/mibgroup/if-mib/data_access/inte
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 07:18:52PM +0200, Hartmut Brandt wrote:
> >I've just found that ports/net-snmp (version 5.4) built
> >WITH_MFD_REWRITES=yes supports IF-MIB, and in theory should show 64-bit
> >ifHC* counters but it does not.
> >
> >It seems agent/mibgroup/if-mib/data_access/interface_sysct
Eugene Grosbein wrote:
Hi!
I've just found that ports/net-snmp (version 5.4) built
WITH_MFD_REWRITES=yes supports IF-MIB, and in theory should show 64-bit
ifHC* counters but it does not.
It seems agent/mibgroup/if-mib/data_access/interface_sysctl.c that obtains
interface statistics from the ker
