Paul Khavkine wrote:
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Julian Elischer wrote:
Paul Khavkine wrote:
Julian.
You should probably look at the ng_etf node too BTW.
How does ng_etf deal with that ?
no, but as an example of something that is designed to be attached directly
to the ng_ether nodes.
i
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Julian Elischer wrote:
>Paul Khavkine wrote:
>> Julian.
>>
>>
>You should probably look at the ng_etf node too BTW.
How does ng_etf deal with that ?
>>>
>>>no, but as an example of something that is designed to be attached directly
>>>to the ng_ether nodes.
>
Paul Khavkine wrote:
Julian.
You should probably look at the ng_etf node too BTW.
How does ng_etf deal with that ?
no, but as an example of something that is designed to be attached directly
to the ng_ether nodes.
in ng_etf, do you check ethertype for only Ethernet II frames ? or also
Julian.
>>>You should probably look at the ng_etf node too BTW.
>>
>>
>> How does ng_etf deal with that ?
>
>no, but as an example of something that is designed to be attached directly
>to the ng_ether nodes.
in ng_etf, do you check ethertype for only Ethernet II frames ? or also
802.3 frames ?
Paul Khavkine wrote:
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Julian Elischer wrote:
Paul Khavkine wrote:
Hi guys.
I'm writing a small program to read raw ethernet frames out of netgraph
to capture Spannign Tree packets from the switch.
Is it possible to pick up STP frames without putting the interface in
pr
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Julian Elischer wrote:
>Paul Khavkine wrote:
>> Hi guys.
>>
>>
>> I'm writing a small program to read raw ethernet frames out of netgraph
>> to capture Spannign Tree packets from the switch.
>>
>> Is it possible to pick up STP frames without putting the interface in
>> promisc
Paul Khavkine wrote:
Hi guys.
I'm writing a small program to read raw ethernet frames out of netgraph
to capture Spannign Tree packets from the switch.
Is it possible to pick up STP frames without putting the interface in
promiscuous mode ?
If you don't put it in promiscuous mode, then you w
