Re: Question on TCP reassembly counter

2010-10-25 Thread Lawrence Stewart
On 10/25/10 17:40, Sriram Gorti wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 5:29 AM, Lawrence Stewart > wrote: >> On 10/22/10 18:10, Sriram Gorti wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 3:08 AM, Lawrence Stewart >>> wrote: >>> >>> Thanks for the fix. Tried it on XLR/XLS and the earlier tes

Re: Question on TCP reassembly counter

2010-10-24 Thread Sriram Gorti
Hi, On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 5:29 AM, Lawrence Stewart wrote: > On 10/22/10 18:10, Sriram Gorti wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 3:08 AM, Lawrence Stewart >> wrote: >> >> Thanks for the fix. Tried it on XLR/XLS and the earlier tests pass >> now. net.inet.tcp.reass.overflows was always

Re: Question on TCP reassembly counter

2010-10-24 Thread Robert Watson
On Sat, 23 Oct 2010, Lawrence Stewart wrote: One observation though: net.inet.tcp.reass.cursegments was non-zero (it was just 1) after 30 rounds, where each round is (as earlier) 15-concurrent instances of netperf for 20s. This was on the netserver side. And, it was zero before the netperf ru

Re: Question on TCP reassembly counter

2010-10-22 Thread Lawrence Stewart
On 10/22/10 18:10, Sriram Gorti wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 3:08 AM, Lawrence Stewart > wrote: >> On 10/04/10 22:12, Lawrence Stewart wrote: >>> On 10/01/10 22:20, Andre Oppermann wrote: On 01.10.2010 12:01, Sriram Gorti wrote: > Hi, > > In the following is an obser

Re: Question on TCP reassembly counter

2010-10-22 Thread Sriram Gorti
Hi, On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 3:08 AM, Lawrence Stewart wrote: > On 10/04/10 22:12, Lawrence Stewart wrote: >> On 10/01/10 22:20, Andre Oppermann wrote: >>> On 01.10.2010 12:01, Sriram Gorti wrote: Hi, In the following is an observation when testing our XLR/XLS network driver wi

Re: Question on TCP reassembly counter

2010-10-17 Thread Lawrence Stewart
On 10/04/10 22:12, Lawrence Stewart wrote: > On 10/01/10 22:20, Andre Oppermann wrote: >> On 01.10.2010 12:01, Sriram Gorti wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> In the following is an observation when testing our XLR/XLS network >>> driver with 16 concurrent instances of netperf on FreeBSD-CURRENT. >>> Based on

Re: Question on TCP reassembly counter

2010-10-04 Thread Lawrence Stewart
On 10/01/10 22:20, Andre Oppermann wrote: > On 01.10.2010 12:01, Sriram Gorti wrote: >> Hi, >> >> In the following is an observation when testing our XLR/XLS network >> driver with 16 concurrent instances of netperf on FreeBSD-CURRENT. >> Based on this observation, I have a question on which I hope

Re: Question on TCP reassembly counter

2010-10-01 Thread Andre Oppermann
On 01.10.2010 12:01, Sriram Gorti wrote: Hi, In the following is an observation when testing our XLR/XLS network driver with 16 concurrent instances of netperf on FreeBSD-CURRENT. Based on this observation, I have a question on which I hope to get some understanding from here. When running 16 c