On Thu, 21 Oct 2004, Vladimir Terziev wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 16:16:50 + (UTC)
> "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > use sth like
> > devicetun1;
> > in your vtun config.
> >
> > PS: vtun is not secure !
>
>Why do you think vtun is not secure ?
Peter Gutman
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 10:08:45AM +0300, Vladimir Terziev wrote:
>Why do you think vtun is not secure ?
This is fact, not opinion:
http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/linux_vpn.txt
BMS
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.
Why do you think vtun is not secure ?
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 16:16:50 + (UTC)
"Bjoern A. Zeeb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Oct 2004, Vladimir Terziev wrote:
>
> > In fact i can't even predict the name of the interface via which the traffic
> > will be routed, because my VPN
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004, Vladimir Terziev wrote:
> In fact i can't even predict the name of the interface via which the traffic
> will be routed, because my VPN is based on VTUN servers. They choose the next free
> tun device, respectively interface, when the VPN connection is established bete
> I read the Quagga documentation a lot of times, but i couldn't find any clue
> how to manipulated metrics when the traffic comes from distinct neighbour. Could you
> help me with this, please ?
offset-list command is mentioned in ripd documentation.
But it seems for me, it is not impleme
In fact i can't even predict the name of the interface via which the traffic
will be routed, because my VPN is based on VTUN servers. They choose the next free tun
device, respectively interface, when the VPN connection is established beteen 2 peers.
I read the Quagga documentat
> One of my VPN peer servers has two VPN connections to every one of the other
> VPN peers. For quagga these are 2 equal-cost routes. When both of the VPN
> connections are established, quagga randomly preffers one of them and routes all VPN
> traffic via it. When one of the connections is
