Re: Processes' FIBs

2013-01-22 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 01:21:27PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote: > Kostik Belousov wrote: > > The patch misses compat32 bits and breaks compat32 ps/top. > > Right, thank you for pointing it out! I missed it because > I only have i386 for testing. > > I've created new patch sets for releng8 and c

Re: Processes' FIBs

2012-01-17 Thread Oliver Fromme
Kostik Belousov wrote: > The patch misses compat32 bits and breaks compat32 ps/top. Right, thank you for pointing it out! I missed it because I only have i386 for testing. I've created new patch sets for releng8 and current. These include compat32 support and an entry for the manual page. Wo

Re: Processes' FIBs

2012-01-15 Thread Julian Elischer
On 1/13/12 4:27 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 10:44:51PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: On 1/12/12 6:04 AM, Oliver Fromme wrote: Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On 11. Jan 2012, at 15:06 , Oliver Fromme wrote: > > I'm currently looking at the source code of ps, but adding

Re: Processes' FIBs

2012-01-13 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 10:44:51PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > On 1/12/12 6:04 AM, Oliver Fromme wrote: > >Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > > > On 11. Jan 2012, at 15:06 , Oliver Fromme wrote: > > > > I'm currently looking at the source code of ps, but adding > > > > a field for the FIB isn't as

Re: Processes' FIBs

2012-01-12 Thread Julian Elischer
On 1/12/12 6:04 AM, Oliver Fromme wrote: Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On 11. Jan 2012, at 15:06 , Oliver Fromme wrote: > > I'm currently looking at the source code of ps, but adding > > a field for the FIB isn't as trivial as I thought because > > ps only sees struct kinfo_proc (via sys

Re: Processes' FIBs

2012-01-12 Thread Oliver Fromme
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On 11. Jan 2012, at 15:06 , Oliver Fromme wrote: > > I'm currently looking at the source code of ps, but adding > > a field for the FIB isn't as trivial as I thought because > > ps only sees struct kinfo_proc (via sysctl kern.proc.*) > > which doesn't contain the FIB.

Re: Processes' FIBs

2012-01-11 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On 11. Jan 2012, at 15:06 , Oliver Fromme wrote: > > Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: >> On 10. Jan 2012, at 20:32 , Paul A. Procacci wrote: >>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 09:12:17PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote: Is there a way to find out the default FIB number of a process (from a shell script)? I'v

Re: Processes' FIBs

2012-01-11 Thread Oliver Fromme
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On 10. Jan 2012, at 20:32 , Paul A. Procacci wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 09:12:17PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote: > > > Is there a way to find out the default FIB number of a > > > process (from a shell script)? I've checked the > > > manpages of ps and procstat,

Re: Processes' FIBs

2012-01-11 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On 10. Jan 2012, at 20:32 , Paul A. Procacci wrote: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2009-April/196532.html > > Not sure about ps/et al, but you can do it according to that post. Nearly 2 > years old now. > If you are thinking in terms of multiple forwarding information

Re: Processes' FIBs

2012-01-10 Thread Paul A. Procacci
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2009-April/196532.html Not sure about ps/et al, but you can do it according to that post. Nearly 2 years old now. ~Paul On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 09:12:17PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a way to find out the default FIB numbe