On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 4:01 AM, Hartmut Brandt wrote:
>> VS>I, probably, was to verbose, and didn't make myself clear enough. For now,
>> VS>from network admin point of view, it's 3 problems:
>> VS>1) No ARP support
>
> The ARP table should be there. It may be that it got 'lost' with the ARP
> ch
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010, alexpalias-bsd...@yahoo.com wrote:
One thing that is not working as expected in bsnmpd (or maybe I'm not
expecting the right thing) is replying to queries on multihomed hosts.
That is, if one machine has 2 network interfaces, one with IP address
192.168.1.1, mask 255.255.
One thing that is not working as expected in bsnmpd (or maybe I'm not expecting
the right thing) is replying to queries on multihomed hosts.
That is, if one machine has 2 network interfaces, one with IP address
192.168.1.1, mask 255.255.255.0 and another 10.10.10.10 (same mask), if a host
on th
On 03/26/10 04:58, Alexander Bubnov wrote:
Hello Harti and freebsd-net maillist!
One more question please in scope of snmp topic. does bsnmp support master
agentx mode?
I totally agree that would be a good way to go, but it's a case of
someone having time to sit down and finish things off
On 26.03.2010 11:01, Hartmut Brandt wrote:
VS>I, probably, was to verbose, and didn't make myself clear enough. For now,
VS>from network admin point of view, it's 3 problems:
VS>1) No ARP support
The ARP table should be there. It may be that it got 'lost' with the ARP
changes last year. So this
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Vasily Samoylov wrote:
VS>On 26.03.2010 9:10, Harti Brandt wrote:
VS>> SS>P.S. Back to the thread topic - so the only problem the author is
VS>> SS>facing with bsnmp is that it lacks support for LLDP, do I understand
VS>> SS>correctly?
VS>>
VS>> This is what I understood too.
On 26.03.2010 9:10, Harti Brandt wrote:
SS>P.S. Back to the thread topic - so the only problem the author is
SS>facing with bsnmp is that it lacks support for LLDP, do I understand
SS>correctly?
This is what I understood too.
harti
I, probably, was to verbose, and didn't make myself clear e
Thanks a lot for your answers.
2010/3/26 Hartmut Brandt
> On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Alexander Bubnov wrote:
>
> AB>I am sorry may be I am going to ask often asked question... Why not to
> AB>implement features which is lacking in net-snmp for FreeBSD instead of
> AB>writing new snmp (bsnmp)? As a plu
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Alexander Bubnov wrote:
AB>I am sorry may be I am going to ask often asked question... Why not to
AB>implement features which is lacking in net-snmp for FreeBSD instead of
AB>writing new snmp (bsnmp)? As a plus net-snmp has BSD like license.
Many years ago I needed a small SN
Hi,
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Alexander Bubnov wrote:
AB>One more question please in scope of snmp topic. does bsnmp support master
AB>agentx mode?
No. I read through the documents and decided that I would not have time to
implement this. I often use external agents in projects, but usually use
cus
Hi,
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Shteryana Shopova wrote:
SS>On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Harti Brandt wrote:
SS>> On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Vasyl Samoilov wrote:
SS>>
SS>>
SS>> - bsnmp is lacking developers (I'm the only one). I had a surgery in
SS>+ 1 (count me in that is)
SS>> november and took the 4
2010/3/25 Harti Brandt
> On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Vasyl Samoilov wrote:
>
> VS>So far I found two options for snmp daemon - bsnmp and net-snmp.
> net-snmo
> VS>giving back invalid data, bsnmp lacks some data at all.
>
> Just two general remarks:
>
> - net-snmp is probably developed on Linux so it do
Hello Harti and freebsd-net maillist!
One more question please in scope of snmp topic. does bsnmp support master
agentx mode?
2010/3/25 Harti Brandt
> On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Vasyl Samoilov wrote:
>
> VS>So far I found two options for snmp daemon - bsnmp and net-snmp.
> net-snmo
> VS>giving back in
25.03.2010 15:59, Shteryana Shopova написав(ла):
We already have BSNMP listed on the SoC project ideas page :) The
problem is we still need a developer to review and test the code
before it can be imported. :)
cheers,
Shteryana
P.S. Back to the thread topic - so the only problem the author is
Hi all,
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Harti Brandt wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Vasyl Samoilov wrote:
>
>
> - bsnmp is lacking developers (I'm the only one). I had a surgery in
+ 1 (count me in that is)
> november and took the 4 weeks after this to rewrite all the networking
> stuff. It is i
On 03/25/10 13:43, Vasyl Samoilov wrote:
Hello.
Lately I was desperatly trying to build a networking element based on
freebsd to fit into overall networking infrastructure. It's not a secret
that virtually anything now can do more or less snmp, thus I was trying
to monitor and query my boxes with
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Vasyl Samoilov wrote:
VS>So far I found two options for snmp daemon - bsnmp and net-snmp. net-snmo
VS>giving back invalid data, bsnmp lacks some data at all.
Just two general remarks:
- net-snmp is probably developed on Linux so it doesn't know how to
access many of the in
17 matches
Mail list logo
