Re: Patch for ip6_sprintf(), please review

2010-05-18 Thread Alfred Perlstein
Thank you Doug, I will be committing this shortly. * Doug Barton [100516 12:21] wrote: > Someone at work has been reading > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representation :) > > This change follows the rules in that draft which will become and RFC as > soon as it finishes w

Re: Patch for ip6_sprintf(), please review

2010-05-18 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Hiroki Sato [100517 22:43] wrote: > Alfred Perlstein wrote > in <20100516062211.gc6...@elvis.mu.org>: > > al> The following patch seems appropriate to apply > al> to fix the kernel ip6_sprintf() function. > al> > al> What it is doing is ensuring that when we > al> abbreviate addresses that t

Re: Patch for ip6_sprintf(), please review

2010-05-17 Thread Hiroki Sato
Alfred Perlstein wrote in <20100516062211.gc6...@elvis.mu.org>: al> The following patch seems appropriate to apply al> to fix the kernel ip6_sprintf() function. al> al> What it is doing is ensuring that when we al> abbreviate addresses that the longest string al> of zeros is shortend, not the f

Re: Patch for ip6_sprintf(), please review

2010-05-16 Thread Doug Barton
Someone at work has been reading http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representation :) This change follows the rules in that draft which will become and RFC as soon as it finishes winding its way through the process, so I am supportive of the change you are proposing. Doug On 5