Re: Panic on boot with em1 attached

2008-12-24 Thread gnn
At Tue, 23 Dec 2008 22:49:24 +0200, Vladimir V. Kobal wrote: > > We are using pf+ALTQ for shaping and ipfw for filtering, diverting into > netgraph nodes, attaching altq queues. > OK, that also makes sense given what I saw in the code. Can you explain your entire setup? That is, which filters,

RE: Panic on boot with em1 attached

2008-12-23 Thread Vladimir V. Kobal
, 2008 9:36 PM To: Vladimir V. Kobal Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Panic on boot with em1 attached OK, that narrows it down. Are you using any filtering such as PF, ipfw, etc.? Best, George ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http

Re: Panic on boot with em1 attached

2008-12-23 Thread gnn
At Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:57:39 +0200, Vladimir V. Kobal wrote: > > With fastforwarding off the system works well and boots without panicing. > OK, that narrows it down. Are you using any filtering such as PF, ipfw, etc.? Best, George ___ freebsd-net@fre

RE: Panic on boot with em1 attached

2008-12-23 Thread Vladimir V. Kobal
: Monday, December 22, 2008 5:28 PM To: Vladimir V. Kobal Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Panic on boot with em1 attached Hi, Can you try this with fastforwarding off? It looks like a double free somewhere in the ip_fastforward() routine. Someone frees m but does not NULL it out and at

Re: Panic on boot with em1 attached

2008-12-22 Thread gnn
Hi, Can you try this with fastforwarding off? It looks like a double free somewhere in the ip_fastforward() routine. Someone frees m but does not NULL it out and at the drop: label the mbuf m is valid but the data within it has already been freed. Knowing if this is related only to the fast for