Re: PPPoE problem: "Too many LQR packets lost"

2004-12-16 Thread Brian Somers
On Sun, 08 Aug 2004 13:01:00 -0400, Mike Tancsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:14:33 -0700, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you > wrote: > > >Mike Tancsa wrote: > > > >>On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 20:42:01 -0700, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you > >>wrote: > >> > >> > >Seriously thou

Re: PPPoE problem: "Too many LQR packets lost"

2004-08-08 Thread Mike Tancsa
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 21:14:33 -0700, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you wrote: >Mike Tancsa wrote: > >>On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 20:42:01 -0700, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you >>wrote: >> >> >Seriously though, mine was a very ugly hack to >get things working again for me. Most of the DSL aggreg

Re: PPPoE problem: "Too many LQR packets lost"

2004-07-27 Thread Mike Tancsa
On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 20:42:01 -0700, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you wrote: >>>Seriously though, mine was a very ugly hack to >>>get things working again for me. Most of the DSL aggregators here >>>are Juniper ERXes which do not play nice with FreeBSD's PPPoE. >>> > >any thoughts as to why? > >Fre

Re: PPPoE problem: "Too many LQR packets lost"

2004-07-26 Thread Julian Elischer
Mike Tancsa wrote: On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 20:42:01 -0700, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you wrote: Seriously though, mine was a very ugly hack to get things working again for me. Most of the DSL aggregators here are Juniper ERXes which do not play nice with FreeBSD's PPPoE. any thoughts as

Re: PPPoE problem: "Too many LQR packets lost"

2004-07-25 Thread Brian Somers
On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 17:29:21 -0400, Mike Tancsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 12:47:26 +1000, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you > wrote: > > > > >I found Mike Tancsa's patch but didn't like it. I rolled my own, which > >seems to be working so far. It works by switching from LQR

Re: PPPoE problem: "Too many LQR packets lost"

2004-07-24 Thread Julian Elischer
Stephen McKay wrote: On Saturday, 24th July 2004, Mike Tancsa wrote: On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 12:47:26 +1000, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you wrote: I found Mike Tancsa's patch but didn't like it. I rolled my own, which seems to be working so far. It works by switching from LQR to simple echo

Re: PPPoE problem: "Too many LQR packets lost"

2004-07-24 Thread Stephen McKay
On Saturday, 24th July 2004, Mike Tancsa wrote: >On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 12:47:26 +1000, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you >wrote: > >>I found Mike Tancsa's patch but didn't like it. I rolled my own, which >>seems to be working so far. It works by switching from LQR to simple >>echo requests when LQR

Re: PPPoE problem: "Too many LQR packets lost"

2004-07-24 Thread Mike Tancsa
On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 12:47:26 +1000, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you wrote: > >I found Mike Tancsa's patch but didn't like it. I rolled my own, which >seems to be working so far. It works by switching from LQR to simple >echo requests when LQR times out. I feel so unliked ;-) Seriously though,

Re: PPPoE problem: "Too many LQR packets lost"

2004-01-19 Thread niranjan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Thanks for your analysis Niranjan. Could you please elaborate on what > you meant about the lcp.c patch not being the correct approach? I think > Mike has tested it in multiple situations, and it has worked well for a > guy in the same situation down here too. >

Re: PPPoE problem: "Too many LQR packets lost"

2004-01-19 Thread nil000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ ... ] Short of actually fixing this LQR negotiation issue (?), might the suggestion of a ppp.conf option to force LCP echo usage be good? Yes. I am surprized it doesn't already have that option since thats a more common scenario. Alternately you could use another ppp

Re: PPPoE problem: "Too many LQR packets lost"

2004-01-19 Thread Mike Tancsa
On Sun, 18 Jan 2004 13:52:24 -0500, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you wrote: > >BTW, the lcp.c patch suggested by someone else is not the correct >approach. It would be great to see a proper config option disable it. However, I dont see any such patches. In the mean time, it works for me. Otherwis

Re: PPPoE problem: "Too many LQR packets lost"

2004-01-18 Thread niranjan
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Since my ADSL connection was moved at my ISP's end from one set of > equipment (norte shasta?) to another (unisphere?), I've been having > problems with my PPPoE sessions. > > With "enable lqr" in my ppp.conf, the connection terminates after a few > mintues with "

Re: PPPoE problem: "Too many LQR packets lost"

2004-01-17 Thread nil000
Andre Oppermann wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: G'day, Since my ADSL connection was moved at my ISP's end from one set of equipment (norte shasta?) to another (unisphere?), I've been having problems with my PPPoE sessions. With "enable lqr" in my ppp.conf, the connection terminates after a few m

Re: PPPoE problem: "Too many LQR packets lost"

2004-01-17 Thread Mike Tancsa
I tried emailing the owner of ppp but got no response. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/11293 Seems to indicate others have run into this as well. I can confirm that here in Canada, FreeBSD's ppp is indeed broken when connecting to Juniper's ERX as part of a PPPoE session. I wo

Re: PPPoE problem: "Too many LQR packets lost"

2004-01-17 Thread Andre Oppermann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > G'day, > > Since my ADSL connection was moved at my ISP's end from one set of > equipment (norte shasta?) to another (unisphere?), I've been having > problems with my PPPoE sessions. > > With "enable lqr" in my ppp.conf, the connection terminates after a few > mintu