Hi,
G> How much Mbytes/sec have you got with MPPE?
I get about 70-80 kbytes/s, while without encrytion the speed is 150-160
kbytes/s (and that's my hardware limit).
A friend of mine tested my configuration in a LAN and got no decrease in the
performance with encryption added. I am going to try to
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 06:09:07PM +0200, Emil Filipov wrote:
E> OK, I have patched (commented) the MRU problem. Now I'm able to successfully
E> connect to the server. But guess what happens when I connect with mppe? I
E> get about half the speed compared to connection without encryption..
E> Top s
> E> As you can see the client does not agree with MRU of 1488 (I tried
initially with the default of 1492). Bug in RASPPPOE implementation?
>
G> Surely. One more person faced this bug. :)
G>
G> On PPPoE ACes I use a patched mpd, where MRU negotiation is commented
out.
G> You should send a bug repo
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 04:22:05PM +0200, Emil Filipov wrote:
<==skip==>
E> Jan 16 15:46:28 opera mpd: [pppoe1] LCP: SendConfigReq #3
E> Jan 16 15:46:28 opera mpd: MRU 1488
E> Jan 16 15:46:28 opera mpd: MAGICNUM 1c5e3cf8
E> Jan 16 15:46:28 opera mpd: AUTHPROTO CHAP MSOFTv2
E> Jan 16 15:46:30 ope
OK guys, according to your advice I'm now trying with mpd (v.3.16).
Works like magic with a SMC Router, but when I try to connect from a Win2k box with
RASPPPOE installed, the LCP negotiation fails.
Here is a logged example of one such failure:
Jan 16 15:46:28 opera mpd: Incoming PPPoE connectio
Hi,
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Emil Filipov wrote:
>
> G> Why don't you try /usr/ports/net/mpd instead of pppoed+ppp?
>
> Because the last time I read the mpd manual, it said that mpd can only act
> as a ppoe client and not as a pppoe server. Which is not true for the last
> mpd version (3.16). So thank
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 01:08:07PM +0200, Emil Filipov wrote:
E> However this does not answer the question about the (broken?) mppe
E> implementation in ppp(8). And I feel more comfortable using base
E> applications, than 3rd party software. It's not that I don't like mpd, it's
E> great, but why us
G> Why don't you try /usr/ports/net/mpd instead of pppoed+ppp?
Because the last time I read the mpd manual, it said that mpd can only act
as a ppoe client and not as a pppoe server. Which is not true for the last
mpd version (3.16). So thanks, this is a possibility that I will test
immediately :)
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 12:31:00PM +0200, Emil Filipov wrote:
E> I am trying to configure a secure pppoe server.So far it works perfectly with
Windows clients authenticating with MSChapv2. However, if MPPE is negotiated, the
client receives only about 1/4th(30-40 kbytes/s) of the bandwidth availa
