On Sunday 07 March 2004 15:37, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> Note that forcing it to 100baseT half-duplex (or 10baseT/UTP half-duplex)
> corrects the problem ... turns out it is only in full-duplex mode that
> its hosed ...
Did you try a cross-over cable? Actually, you shouldn't even need a
cross-
From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sat, 6 Mar 2004, Tim Wilde wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 6 Mar 2004, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >
> > > I have two servers on the same network switch, sitting
> one on top of the
> > > other ... one is running an em (Dual-Xeon 2.4Ghz) device,
> the oth
On Sat, 6 Mar 2004, Tim Wilde wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Mar 2004, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> > I have two servers on the same network switch, sitting one on top of the
> > other ... one is running an em (Dual-Xeon 2.4Ghz) device, the other an fxp
> > (Dual-PIII 1.3Ghz) device ...
>
> Is it a Cisco Catal
On Sat, 6 Mar 2004, Tim Wilde wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Mar 2004, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> > I have two servers on the same network switch, sitting one on top of the
> > other ... one is running an em (Dual-Xeon 2.4Ghz) device, the other an fxp
> > (Dual-PIII 1.3Ghz) device ...
>
> Is it a Cisco Catal
On Sat, 6 Mar 2004, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> I have two servers on the same network switch, sitting one on top of the
> other ... one is running an em (Dual-Xeon 2.4Ghz) device, the other an fxp
> (Dual-PIII 1.3Ghz) device ...
Is it a Cisco Catalyst switch? If so, you need to switch the em's to
