I am using trafd and I am quite happy with it, if I dump internal tables to
disk often enough.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Seguin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 11:11 PM
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Network accounting
I’ve searched Google, I’v
I've been following this little thread and was curious about how
my own solution compares w/ the others discussed.
x.y.z.14
${ipfw} add pipe 7 ip from x.y.z.14 to any
${ipfw} pipe 7 config bw 1024Kbit/s queue 50
${ipfw} add pipe 8 ip from any to x.y.z.14
${ipfw} pipe 8 config bw 1024Kbit
Andrew Seguin wrote:
I therefore ask out to the list, what recommendations for traffic
accounting/statistics gathering can you give me?
just for kicks you may look at what glen has in his toolkit (netgraph)
for monitorring stuff.
e.g. the ng_netflow netgraph module and some other stuff that
has
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 23:07:54 +0100, Andrew Seguin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With the help, in pointing out the mask feature to me from Jon Simola, this
> quite possibly might be the path I'll take (I'll sleep on it first).
> Interfaces are 100Mbps, but our internet is about 50Mbps total I beli
Interfaces are 100Mbps, but our internet is about 50Mbps total I believe
(still have yet to get hard facts from people here). With our daily traffic,
we see always 80GB total daily... but I'll keep hourly accounting in mind.
[Mitch says:] With 100Mbps interfaces, you have to be prepared to clear t
-Original Message-
From: Mitch (Bitblock) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 10:51 PM
To: 'Andrew Seguin'; freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: Network accounting
[Mitch says:] you could also use a simple PERL program to parse the output
from your ipfw co
Andrew Seguin wrote:
[ ... ]
I don't understand how this system will allow me to log traffic by-ip
without addition of 256 rules?
I already have counts of my up & down traffic. Actually, I have a bypass
rule for 'normal' traffic (web/email/dns/icmp/etc), and then a pipe to
control bandwidth (mainly
ECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 10:49 PM
To: Andrew Seguin; freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Network accounting
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 22:41:16 +0100, Andrew Seguin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >What I was doing with the same setup:
> >$IPFW pipe 1 config mask src-ip 0xf
If I understand this correctly... I'd have to add SNMP to the server and rtg
would then poll via SNMP, storing the results in the MySQL server. Seems
very good, but I'm a bit hesitant just because I'd like to keep as few
software packages as possible running on the firewall.
[Mitch says:] y
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 22:41:16 +0100, Andrew Seguin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >What I was doing with the same setup:
> >$IPFW pipe 1 config mask src-ip 0x buckets 512
> >$IPFW pipe 2 config mask dst-ip 0x buckets 512
> >$IPFW add 32001 pipe 1 src-ip 192.168.110.0/24 bridged
> >$IP
-Original Message-
From: Jon Simola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 10:27 PM
To: Andrew Seguin; freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Network accounting
...
>What I was doing with the same setup:
>$IPFW pipe 1 config mask src-ip 0x buckets 512
>$IP
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 21:11:13 +0100, Andrew Seguin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But, here's my situation. A dedicated FreeBSD transparent firewall-bridge
> with 3 NICs (two for the bridge w/o IP, one for console). I'm using IPFW for
> the firewall, and at the moment I'm doing some very bare-bones s
-Original Message-
From: Mitch (Bitblock) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Network accounting
...
[Mitch says:] Just a thought:
http://rtg.sourceforge.net ?
hth
If I understand this correctly... I'd have to add SNMP to the server and rtg
would then poll via SNMP, st
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Andrew Seguin
Sent: January 17, 2005 12:11 PM
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Network accounting
I've searched Google, I've searched through the FreeBSD-net archives and
have gotten a few leads to what I
14 matches
Mail list logo
