Oliver Peter [2016-11-16 12:05 +0100] :
> The interesting thing here is that /all/ traffic happens on lo0 - even for
> jail1 which sits on lo1 only - which I don't understand.
I had been wondering about the same thing some while ago:
http://marc.info/?l=freebsd-questions&m=147049889417893&w=2
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 02:49:18PM +, Big Lebowski wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Oliver Peter wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 01:03:54PM +, Big Lebowski wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Oliver Peter
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > El duderino,
> > > >
> > > > On M
Hi.
We have had the same needs earlier, but solved it in our network.
Although I have been considering the possibility if there was an easy
ACL based way to get jails to talk with each other e.g with sockets and
related filters in the 127.0.0.0/8 ip range.
Without having deep insights in the
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Oliver Peter wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 01:03:54PM +, Big Lebowski wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Oliver Peter
> wrote:
> >
> > > El duderino,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 10:30:59PM +, Big Lebowski wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I am t
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 01:03:54PM +, Big Lebowski wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Oliver Peter wrote:
>
> > El duderino,
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 10:30:59PM +, Big Lebowski wrote:
> > >
> > > I am trying to set up a 11.0-R PF based NAT for group of jails that needs
> >
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Oliver Peter wrote:
> El duderino,
>
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 10:30:59PM +, Big Lebowski wrote:
> >
> > I am trying to set up a 11.0-R PF based NAT for group of jails that needs
> > to be able to talk to services on other jails, just as if they'd be
> client
El duderino,
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 10:30:59PM +, Big Lebowski wrote:
>
> I am trying to set up a 11.0-R PF based NAT for group of jails that needs
> to be able to talk to services on other jails, just as if they'd be clients
> from outside of the network. Apparently, this is called 'NAT ref
