Bump
Has anyone else reviewed this code? I have looked it over but not run it.
Visually it looks fine to me.
Best,
George
On Sep 4, 2013, at 4:04 , Takuya ASADA wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is 2nd version of multiqueue bpf patch, I think I fixed things what
> you commented on previous mail.
> Her
Hi,
This is 2nd version of multiqueue bpf patch, I think I fixed things what
you commented on previous mail.
Here's a change list of the patch:
- Drop added functions on struct
ifnet(if_get_[rt]xqueue_len/if_get_[rt]xqueue_affinity).
HW queue number and queue affinity informations are maybe usefu
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Takuya ASADA wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do you have an updated URL for the diffs ? The link below from your
>> original message
>> seems not working now (NXDOMAIN)
>>
>> http://www.dokukino.com/mq_bpf_20110813.diff
>>
>
> Changes with recent head is on my repository:
> http
Hi,
Do you have an updated URL for the diffs ? The link below from your
> original message
> seems not working now (NXDOMAIN)
>
> http://www.dokukino.com/mq_bpf_20110813.diff
>
Changes with recent head is on my repository:
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/user/syuu/mq_bpf/
And I attached a diff fil
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Takuya ASADA wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to propose multiqueue support for bpf.
> It's result of GSoC'11, and proposed on freebsd-net at Aug.2011 but not yet
> merged:
>
> http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2011/syuu1228/1
> http://list
Hi,
Probably my previous mail had been skipped or forgot replying, so I'd
like to try notice again.
# This is original post of this thread, if you don't remember what is
this: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2011-August/029585.html
George said "I think we should try to integrate th
Sorry for late replying,
> One comment, one question.
>
> First, I think we should try to integrate this work and then tune it up more.
> The API
> is, I think, fine, and performance tuning takes a bit of work.
Is there good way(I mean tools or something) to find the bottleneck?
> Second, what
On Aug 19, 2011, at 04:21 , Takuya ASADA wrote:
> Any comments or suggestions?
>
>
One comment, one question.
First, I think we should try to integrate this work and then tune it up more.
The API
is, I think, fine, and performance tuning takes a bit of work.
Second, what are the parameters
Any comments or suggestions?
2011/8/18 Takuya ASADA :
> 2011/8/16 Vlad Galu :
>> On Aug 16, 2011, at 11:50 AM, Vlad Galu wrote:
>>> On Aug 16, 2011, at 11:13 AM, Takuya ASADA wrote:
Hi all,
I implemented multiqueue support for bpf, I'd like to present for review.
This is a Goog
2011/8/16 Vlad Galu :
> On Aug 16, 2011, at 11:50 AM, Vlad Galu wrote:
>> On Aug 16, 2011, at 11:13 AM, Takuya ASADA wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I implemented multiqueue support for bpf, I'd like to present for review.
>>> This is a Google Summer of Code project, the project goal is to
>>> support m
On Aug 16, 2011, at 11:50 AM, Vlad Galu wrote:
> On Aug 16, 2011, at 11:13 AM, Takuya ASADA wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I implemented multiqueue support for bpf, I'd like to present for review.
>> This is a Google Summer of Code project, the project goal is to
>> support multiqueue network interface o
On Aug 16, 2011, at 11:13 AM, Takuya ASADA wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I implemented multiqueue support for bpf, I'd like to present for review.
> This is a Google Summer of Code project, the project goal is to
> support multiqueue network interface on BPF, and provide interfaces
> for multithreaded pack
12 matches
Mail list logo
