JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote
in :
ji> > So I guess the question is: what do we do? It looks like we're in
ji> > violation of both RFC 3493, Section 5.3 and POSIX 2008, Volume 2, Section
ji> > 2.10.20*.
ji>
ji> ...aside from what FreeBSD should do for ip6.v6only, I personally
ji> believe that real
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013, at 20:15, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
> At Fri, 28 Jun 2013 17:30:21 -0500,
> "Mark Felder" wrote:
>
> > Later after a bit more digging and discussion I've come to learn that the
>
> So, you've gone through the literature on this topic including
> http://tools.ietf.org/ht
At Fri, 28 Jun 2013 17:30:21 -0500,
"Mark Felder" wrote:
> Later after a bit more digging and discussion I've come to learn that the
So, you've gone through the literature on this topic including
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cmetz-v6ops-v4mapped-api-harmful-01
?
> security aspect may simp
