Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
Rui Paulo wrote:
Well, I was asking for comments regarding on the usage of these flags.
I was hoping to commit ip.h along with TCP ECN.
This doesn't really need to be before the branch, I think.
Looks fine to me. ECN would be a useful feature to have. AFAIK nothing
e
Rui Paulo wrote:
Well, I was asking for comments regarding on the usage of these flags.
I was hoping to commit ip.h along with TCP ECN.
This doesn't really need to be before the branch, I think.
Looks fine to me. ECN would be a useful feature to have. AFAIK nothing
else uses these flags.
A
Andre Oppermann wrote:
Rui Paulo wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on TCP ECN support and I would like to kill these defines
from netinet/ip.h
#if 1
/* ECN RFC3168 obsoletes RFC2481, and these will be deprecated soon. */
#define IPTOS_CE0x01
#define IPTOS_ECT 0x02
#endif
T
Rui Paulo wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on TCP ECN support and I would like to kill these defines
from netinet/ip.h
#if 1
/* ECN RFC3168 obsoletes RFC2481, and these will be deprecated soon. */
#define IPTOS_CE0x01
#define IPTOS_ECT 0x02
#endif
The are outdated and shou
Rui Paulo wrote:
The only consumer of the RFC 2481 defines is sbin/ipfw/ipfw2.c and
luigi@ accepted the attached patch.
Here's the attached patch.
--
Rui Paulo
Index: ipfw2.c
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sbin/ipfw/ipfw2.c,v
retrie
